In the US,
our American Communists saw Gay Marriage as an opportunity to champion a new
“victim” and further denigrate Christianity. So, Gay Marriage became a
political cause. Marriage Regulation does not appear in the enumerated powers
granted to the federal government, but that has never stopped them before. The
article below includes some of the material the Supreme Court will be
discussing. – Norb Leahy
The very notion
of “gay marriage” is an artificial construct. It’s the aberrant byproduct of
the sexual revolution, which, itself, was largely instigated by bug doctor turned
“sexologist,” Alfred Kinsey.
Though married
to a woman who took part in his many filmed “scientific” orgies, Kinsey was a
promiscuous homosexual and sadomasochist. He managed to completely upend and
twist the world’s perception of human sexuality in the 1950s and ’60s with his
world famous “Kinsey Reports.”
While his
“research” has been universally discredited and exposed as fraudulent,
ideologically motivated and even criminal, it remains, nonetheless, the primary
source behind today’s “sexual orientation science.”
For this
reason, and many others, the novel notion of “gay marriage” sits atop a house
of cards.
On April 28,
the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on whether to attempt, once and
for all, the deconstruction and redefinition of the institution of marriage.
The court will then hand down a decision by the end of June. In anticipation of
this landmark case, civil rights law firm Liberty Counsel has submitted to the
Supreme Court a friend of the court brief that reveals the criminally fraudulent foundation upon
which the “marriage equality” Tower of Babel has been raised.
Among other
things, the brief features the findings of Dr. Judith Reisman, the foremost
expert on Kinsey’s pseudo-scientific cultural activism. Reisman has served as
scientific consultant to four U.S. Department of Justice administrations, the
U.S. Department of Education and the U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS). She is a visiting professor of law at Liberty University School
of Law and works hand-in-hand with Liberty Counsel.
As the brief
reveals, most people are completely unaware that during his tenure at Indiana
University, Kinsey facilitated, with stopwatches and ledgers, the systematic
sexual abuse of hundreds, if not thousands, of children and infants – all in
the name of science.
Kinsey asserted
that children are “sexual from birth.” He further concluded, based upon
experiments he directed and documented in his infamous Table 34,
that adult-child sex is harmless, even beneficial, and described child “orgasm”
as “culminating in extreme trembling, collapse, loss of color, and sometimes
fainting. …” Many children suffered “excruciating pain,” he observed, “and
[would] scream if movement [was] continued.” Some “[would] fight away from the
[adult] partner and may make violent attempts to avoid climax, although they
derive[d] definite pleasure from the situation.”
It’s little wonder that Dr. Reisman
identifies Kinsey as a “sexual psychopath.” These children were as young as 2
months old.
Kinsey’s
research also determined that rape doesn’t really hurt women. In his 1953
volume “Sexual Behavior in the Human Female” at page 122, Kinsey wrote, “Among
the 4,441 females [reporting rape] on whom we have data, there was only one
clear cut case of injury … and very few instances of vaginal bleeding, which
however, did not appear to do any appreciable damage.”
Kinsey claimed
that, like himself, over 30 percent of men are homosexual (today’s legitimate
research has established this figure to actually fall somewhere between 1-3
percent). There can be no doubt that, if he were alive today, Alfred Kinsey
would be one of the loudest voices clamoring for the redefinition of marriage.
“For the past
67 years, scholars, lawyers and judges have undertaken fundamental societal
transformation by embracing Alfred Kinsey’s statistically and scientifically
fraudulent ‘data’ derived from serial child rapists, sex offenders, prisoners,
prostitutes, pedophiles and pederasts,” notes the brief. “Now these same change
agents, still covering up the fraudulent nature of the Kinsey ‘data,’ want this
Court to utilize it to demolish the cornerstone of society, natural marriage.”
“Changing
millennia of history must always be approached with trepidation,” the brief
continues. “In this case, the change must be rejected outright not only because
it is seeking to redefine something which cannot be redefined, but also because
the proposed change is grounded in fraudulent ‘research’ based on skewed
demographics and the sexual abuse of hundreds of infants and children.”
The brief
pleads with the Supreme Court not to “erase millennia of human history and
dismantle the granite cornerstone of society in favor of an experimental
construct that is barely a decade old.” Instead, Liberty Counsel asserts, “This
case presents the Court with the opportunity to affirm and preserve the unique,
comprehensive union of a man and a woman, the foundational social institution
upon which society was built and the future of the nation depends.”
In the past,
the Supreme Court has upheld marriage as a foundational social institution that
is necessarily defined as the union of one man and one woman:
Marriage is
“fundamental to the very existence and survival of the race.” Skinner v.
Oklahoma, 316 U.S. 535, 541 (1942).
“An institution
in the maintenance of which in its purity the public is deeply interested, for
it is the foundation of the family and of society, without which there would be
neither civilization nor progress.” Maynard v. Hill, 125 U. S. 190 (1888).
“Older than the
Constitution and the laws of any nation, marriage is not a creation of any
government, but it is an obvious relationship between one man and one woman.
Marriage is a natural bond that society or religion can only
‘solemnize,’” said Mat Staver, founder and chairman of Liberty Counsel.
It is a tragic
commentary on America’s moral freefall that the highest court in the land would
consider, even for an instant, perverting the cornerstone institution of
marriage to reflect the psychotic image and anti-social activism of a man who,
himself, was a criminal pervert.
Liberty Counsel
is calling Christians to unite in fasting and prayer for three days before the
Supreme Court hears the case – on April 23, 24 and 25.
At this point,
prayer alone may save marriage and keep, at bay, the wrath of a just and Holy
God.
http://eaglerising.com/17479/the-gay-marriage-agenda-is-rooted-in-a-disgusting-fraud/
Comments
Cui bono, who
will benefit from this Gay Marriage debate ?
I would hope that the Supreme
Court also debates the Gay problem as a sub-culture in a free society, with no
reason for the government to give benefit and comfort and no reason to impose
punishment or blame. But that would be too optimistic to expect the federal
court to follow the US Constitution and the 10th Amendment this time
either.
Norb Leahy,
Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader
No comments:
Post a Comment