June 21, 2013, NewsWithViews.com
SCHOOL
CHOICE IS TOTAL FEDERAL CONTROL
What would you do, if you wanted to
be in charge/control of our nation, its economy, and the people themselves? You
would use the Hegelian dialectic:
create problem (dumbing down) over a long period of time (gradualism), people
scream, impose a solution the people never would have accepted had the problem
not been deliberately and gradually created. The "change agent" plan
would be to dumb-down the schools and destroy children's values to the extent
parents would accept ANY
solution, no matter how poisonous. They would even consider giving up our
sacred guarantee of involvement in decision making regarding our children's
education. We could lose the right to vote for persons we feel will represent
the best interests and values of our children/families, and to vote them out of
office if they do not fulfill their promises made prior to the election!
"They" have always had
school choice on "their" agenda since it is essential for training
for the work force (small units of training for individual skills) to which
parents initially send their children. They are unaware that the ultimate
intent is for these small units to be enlarged and used for Soviet polytech
work force training. These small units (charter schools) presently seem an
attractive option since they offer some form of choice, perhaps
health-oriented, music-oriented, foreign languages-oriented, etc.
Please read the one page article
regarding South Shore Charter School, 1993. Simply click on this link and scroll down to South Shore Charter School and open the
document.
Now, ask yourself why President
Obama, David Rockefeller of the globalist Council on Foreign Relations, which
true conservatives detest, and the neo-conservatives (Heritage, et al) would
all be in agreement on school choice. That doesn't make sense, does it? What is
there to like about that?
There is nothing to like about that
since "that" represents the end of our free, representative form of
government by ELECTED officials.
If there had been another important area of American society "they"
could have used to do away with elected officials, they might have used that
area. Public education was the perfect vehicle to start the ball rolling since
its federal budget is probably the largest, after Defense, in the discretionary
category (6%). If "they" can get the American people to turn that
budget over to the "unelected"
planners (Soviet council form of government), what is to keep them
from convincing the American people that we don't need elected officials
anymore, at any level of government, local, county, state, and ultimately
federal? Plus, that 6 % is only a small portion of the overall spending, if one
includes spending at the state and local property tax levels, approval of which
is presently determined by local and state elected officials. (Here is the documentation regarding the federal budget
breakdown).
There will be NO choice if the
Governor's corporatist/ Heritage/Obama/CFR agenda is allowed to be implemented.
All schools will be required to teach to the Communist Core, and true private
education will be dead. In addition, and probably of even greater importance,
if we accept this agenda, we may well be pushing that unelected charter school
snowball off the top of the mountain. It will pick up speed and destroy ALL, repeat ALL, elected levels of our
government, replacing them with unelected
councils! (This is Lenin's council form of government/regionalism.)
Please read the following article by
Morris Zeitlin, sociologist, University of California, L.A., 1976, published in
The (Communist) Daily World:
THE DAILY WORLD OF NOVEMBER 8, 1975
CARRIED A VERY INTERESTING ARTICLE ENTITLED “Planning Is Socialism’s Trademark”
by Morris Zeitlin. "The Daily World" (newspaper of the Communist
Party USA) was formerly known as "The Daily Worker," and was founded
in 1924. The importance of this article lies in its blatant admission that
regionalism, which is gradually becoming the accepted method of unelected
governance in the United States (unelected councils and task forces,
participatory democracy, public-private partnerships, etc.) is the form of
government used in democratic socialist and communist countries.
The following are excerpts from this
article: Cities in industrially
advanced countries develop complex economic, social and political interaction.
In this process, major cities tend to consolidate neighboring smaller cities
and settlements into metropolitan regions. Rationally, metropolitan regions
should constitute governmental units having comprehensive planning and
administrative powers within their boundaries.
In our
country (the United States), rival capitalist groups, jealously guarding their
special prerogatives, have rigidly maintained the traditional boundaries of
states and counties while national economic and social development has created
metropolitan regions that overlap those boundaries. We have no regional
government and no comprehensive regional planning to speak of. Regional
government and planning remain concepts our urban scholars and planners have
long advocated in vain....
In socialist
countries, metropolitan regions enjoy metropolitan regional government and
comprehensive planning. Of the many regions on the vast territory of the Soviet
Union, the Moscow Region commands special attention, for it has been, since the
1917 Revolution, the country’s economic and political center.
The
economic and functional efficiencies and the social benefits that comprehensive
national, regional and city planning make possible in socialist society explain
the Soviet Union’s enormous and rapid economic and social progress. Conversely,
our profit-oriented ruling capitalist class makes comprehensive social and
economic planning impossible, causing waste and chaos and dragging the entire
nation into misery and suffering as its rule deteriorates and declines.
For a more complete understanding of
what has happened, and how the USA ever arrived close to accepting the Soviet
system, one can go to here
for the transcript of Edward Griffin's interview with Norman Dodd. He was the
principal investigator for the Congressional Committee Investigating the
Tax-exempt Foundations, 1953, aka Reece Committee. The complete 3,000 page
transcript of the Congressional Hearings can be downloaded here.
During the interview Mr. Rowan
Gaither, the President of the Ford Foundation, said:
"Mr.
Dodd, all of us here at the policy level of the Foundation, have at one time or
another served in the OSS [Office of Strategic Services, the forerunner of the
CIA] or the European Economic Administration, operating under directives from
the White House. We operate under those same directives...The substance of the
directives under which we operate is that we shall use our grant making power
to so alter life in the United States that we can be comfortably merged with
the Soviet Union."
(Think about all the grants
throughout America today from HUD, DOE, DOI, etc. that are giving federal
dollars to implement UN Agenda 21)
Stunned, Dodd finally replied: "Why don't you tell the American people
what you just told me and you could save the taxpayers thousands of dollars set
aside for this investigation?" Gaither responded, "Mr. Dodd, we wouldn't think of doing
that."
Note: President Dwight Eisenhower
signed the first United States-USSR Educational and Cultural Exchange
Agreements with President Khrushchev in 1958. In 1985, President Ronald Reagan
signed the most extensive educational and cultural agreements with former President
Gorbachev, which merged the two education systems. At the same time, the
Carnegie Corporation of New York, President David Hamburg, signed an important
agreement with the Soviet Academy of Science which related to United
States/USSR cooperation in the development of computer software in critical
thinking (Marxist thinking) for elementary school students. aka Communist Core?
Be sure to read "Iserbyt Letter to Schlafly,"
1995, which contains documentation regarding the role of
libertarians/neo-conservatives in pushing the school choice and unelected form
of government agenda. Willard Garvey's letter to President Reagan is included
as an attachment to my letter to Schlafly.
The following is excerpted from an article related to the late Willard Garvey. Mr. Garvey had the resources to do more than just talk about his
political ideas. In 1983, for instance, he launched the National Center for
Privatization. The organization's goal was to dismantle as much of government
as possible and turn the work over to the private sector.
Garvey's
Letter to Reagan
This worried Democrats and others
who felt they had no influence with Garvey and his movement. To this day, a curious Web site is
keeping watch on the National Center for Privatization and other conservative
organizations.
"In 1984, Willard Garvey wrote
a letter to then President Reagan," the Web site begins, going on to quote
Mr. Garvey's letter urging Reagan to make shrinking government his top
priority.
"Privatization
... dates back at least to Adam Smith, Plato, Aristotle and Jesus," Garvey
writes.
"Privatization
is now an idea whose time has come. The knowledge, communication and computer
industry can make political representatives obsolete," he adds.
My 1985, "Back to Basics Reform
or OBE Skinnerian International Curriculum," 49 pages is available as a
pdf download as well. [Link]
Documentation for everything I have
written in this article can be found at either the Deliberate Dumbing Down or
American Deception websites.
P.S. An
important aside: Why should the taxpayers be expected to pay for training the
corporation's workers? Corporations used to train their own workers. This
situation, which is being accepted by those involved with Common Core and
Workforce Training, in Maine and elsewhere, should be carefully studied. It is
an important subject in its own right.
Good luck to all of you and may God
bless your efforts to keep our nation under the United States Constitution not under the United Nations communist world
government planned since the early years of the 20th Century, at least. If you have any questions,
please email me.
Americans had better wake up to the
fact that education is “The” Trojan Horse. Please, for the sake of our children
and our teachers, for the sake of our formerly free nation, put aside all your
differences related to conservative and liberal, right and left, Republican and
Democrat. Please spread the information in this article to everyone you know,
including ministers, businessmen, elected officials, college officials, and
public and private school teachers and administrators.
http://www.newswithviews.com/iserbyt/iserbyt118.htm
An updated, abridged version of “The
Deliberate Dumbing Down of America” can be purchased
from NewsWithViews on their online store front. I do
not like to add a personal dimension to this discussion, but now must. Ask
yourself why my little Back to Basics
Reform or OBE Skinnerian International Curriculum...necessary for U.S.
participation in a one world socialist government scheduled for the early years
of the 21st century," 1985; and my 750-page "The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America," 1999, were boycotted by the major national
conservative organizations. The updated 2011, abridged version, which covers
the role of Gates, Pearson, UN Agenda 21, etc., is receiving the same boycott
attrition. However, the reader can access them FREE. "The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America,"
1999, 750 pages, is a free download. [Link]
© 2013 Charlotte T. Iserbyt
- All Rights Reserved
No comments:
Post a Comment