Separation of church and state in the United States
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"Separation of church and state"
is paraphrased from
Thomas
Jefferson and used by others in expressing an
understanding of the intent and function of the Establishment Clause and Free Exercise Clause of the First
Amendment to the Constitution of the United States which
reads: "Congress shall make
no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free
exercise thereof..."
The phrase
"separation between church & state" is generally traced to
a January
1, 1802, letter by Thomas
Jefferson, addressed to the Danbury
Baptist Association in
Connecticut, and published in a Massachusetts newspaper. Jefferson wrote,
I contemplate with
sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that
their legislature should 'make no law respecting an establishment of religion,
or prohibiting the free exercise thereof', thus building a wall of separation
between Church & State."
Jefferson was echoing
the language of the founder of the first Baptist church in America, Roger Williams who,
in 1644, had written of a hedge or wall of separation between the garden of the church and the wilderness of the world.
Article
Six of the United States Constitution also specifies
that "no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United
States."
Jefferson's metaphor of
a wall of separation has been cited repeatedly by the U.S. Supreme Court.
In Reynolds v.
United States (1879) the Court wrote that
Jefferson's comments "may be accepted almost as an authoritative
declaration of the scope and effect of the [First] Amendment."
In Everson v. Board
of Education (1947), Justice Hugo
Black wrote: "In the words of Thomas Jefferson, the
clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect a wall of
separation between church and state."
In contrast to
separation-ism, the Supreme Court in Zorach v. Clauson upheld accommodation-ism, holding that the nation's "institutions presuppose a Supreme
Being" and that government recognition of God does not constitute the
establishment of a state church as the Constitution's authors intended to
prohibit. As such, the Court has not always interpreted the constitutional
principle as absolute, and the proper extent of separation between government
and religion in the U.S. remains an ongoing subject of impassioned debate.
Comments
I believe Jefferson’s
letter was merely his reassurance to the Baptists that Congress would never
declare a “national religion” to endanger their particular denomination. But
secular humanism did replace Christianity in the US to the delight of a hand
full of atheists and the entire American Communist Party.
Norb Leahy, Dunwoody
GA Tea Party Leader
No comments:
Post a Comment