Monday, December 17, 2018

Border Wall


Having the US Military on the Mexican Border without a full wall is more expensive, more dangerous and less effective. It is not sustainable over time. We have 20,000 Border Agents on the Border with a cost of $42 billion per year and would continue to need US Military costing another $1billion per year.  A border wall would pay for itself within a few years

Trump is a businessman. Democrats think government is a jobs program. 66% of US voters think we need a border wall. I think the DOD should build the wall and pay for it out of their budget. Building the wall is a legitimate “defense” expenditure we’ve made since 1848. Defending the US Border is the highest military priority we currently have. It is far more important than defending other countries’ borders.

The cost of deploying the National Guard to the Mexican Border was $1.35 billion for 40 months between 2006 and 2011.

In what he dubbed "Operation Jump Start," Bush authorized the deployment of 6,000 National Guard troops to California, Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas. They stayed there for around two years, from June 2006 to July 2008. The cost was $1.2 billion, according to congressional testimony from Major General John Nichols, who's in charge of the Texas National Guard. That comes out to roughly $100,000 per troop each year.

The Homeland Security budget is another legitimate source of funding the construction of the Border Wall.

The FY 2019 Budget reflects the administration's priorities, including ensuring the safety and security of the American people. The budget requests $47.5 billion in discretionary budget authority for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), a $3.5 billion or 7.8 percent increase from the FY 2018 President's Budget.

Congress is useless. See article below:

Trump Cannot Lose Border Wall Fight — But America Could, by Conservative Zone, 12/16/18.

After the recent attack on U.S. Border Patrol officers by the migrant caravan mob and attempts to extort American taxpayers to the tune of $50,000, Pres. Donald J. Trump occupies a no-lose situation in the border wall fight

His insistence that Congress immediately provide $5 billion in border security that includes approximately 215 miles of wall funding has the full support of the American people. A recent poll indicates that two-thirds of supporters back Pres. Trump shutting down the government until Congress provides the funding to secure the southern border.

In a recent dust-up with Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and expected incoming House Majority Leader Nancy Pelosi, the pair of Democrats refused to provide additional funding to secure the U.S.-Mexico border.
“The last time, Chuck, you shut it down,” Pres. Trump said. “If we don’t get what we want … I am proud to shut down the government for border security, Chuck.”

Among the groups polled, 47 percent of the president’s base supporters feel strongly that he should in no way, shape or form compromise on border security. A majority of working-class Americans and those living in rural areas say that the president should not just insist on the short-term $5 billion, but the entire $25 billion required to complete a comprehensive border security initiative. All told, a reported 67 percent of those who voted to put the Republican in the White House identify border security and the proposed wall as an immediate and necessary priority.

“In February of this year 44 Democrats including Schumer, voted for a bill that had $25 billion for a wall. In 2013 Schumer helped create a bill that I was part of that had $8 billion for a wall — $42 billion for securing the border in other ways,” South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham said. “So, they’re just — they want Trump to lose more than they want the country to win.”

But based on voting poll statistics, Pres. Trump is in the driver’s seat regarding political clout. Regardless of whether he shuts down the government and breaks Democrats’ political will or secures immediate funding, the voting base that elected the Washington outsider will likely return to the 2020 election booths in spades.

Unlike Democrats, the president will be relatively unaffected by the biased mainstream media who have grossly overplayed their hand. More than 90 percent of the liberal media reporting is negative against Pres. Trump, and declining ratings at outlets such as CNN show Americans are tuning out and don’t believe the propaganda when they hear it. Simply put, Pres. Trump enjoys a no-lose political position. However, the same cannot be said for the country.
While Republicans control both houses until the end of the year, a bill that includes the requested $5 billion has been floated in the House. However, liberal donors that exploit illegal immigrants for cheap labor have tasked Democrats with attaching some unsavory add-ons should.

Corporate liberal backers pushing for open borders have managed to get the following tacked on:
·       A form of amnesty for DACA illegals
·       Renewed Obama-era catch and release mandates
·       Automatic refugee status for migrants
·       200,000 green cards for India citizens
·       The tripling of H-2B visas for foreign workers

The bill would not offer additional funding for the Border Patrol to detain illegal migrants or hire the additional 1,000 ICE agents requested by the Department of Homeland Security — despite the increase of illegal immigrants penetrating the country’s southern border.

“I think the president and people like me need to make the case to the American people that they’re denying this president money that makes sense. The difference between $1.6 billion and $5 billion is what we’re talking about,” Sen. Graham added. “He’s in a good spot, dig in, make the case that this money is necessary and challenge the Democrats to work with you on DACA, plus the wall. And if they say no to that, that means they really do hate Trump more than they care about the country and that will blow up in their face.”


Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader

No comments: