By
Ben Shapiro, 12/19/18
Last
month, the New York State Education Department made a crucial decision:
Commissioner Mary Ellen Elia handed authority to local school boards to veto
the right for private schools to operate.
Those
school boards must now determine whether private schools provide an education
"substantially equivalent to that received in district public
schools."
According
to Jewish educators Elya Brudny and Yisroel Reisman, "The state government
now requires private schools to offer a specific set of classes more
comprehensive than what students in public schools must learn."
This
isn't a problem for Jewish schools alone — Catholic schools in New York have
bucked the legislation, with James Cultrara, executive secretary of the New
York Council of Catholic School Superintendents, explaining, "We simply
cannot accept a competing school having authority over whether our schools can
operate."
Now
there's a case to be made that the state has an interest in children learning
basic secular studies, and to that end, Cultrara has called for an objective
standard for evaluating whether or not schools are properly educating their
students. That case is far stronger in a welfare state, in which insufficient
education often ends with the public bearing the brunt of such failures.
But
there's also a case to be made that parents are the best sources for judging
which educational standards their children should obtain — and that attempting
to force-feed education to unwilling students and parents at threat of legal
peril is a massive imposition on freedom. It's also unlikely that a broadly
applied standard of education will succeed in raising standards across the
board. The public school system hasn't been able to achieve that even absent
religious conflicts.
More
fascinating than this debate, however, is the generalized attitude toward
parenting expressed by the social left. If you choose to send your child to a
non-approved yeshiva, you must be policed and your child threatened with
truancy. If, however, you are a parent who decides to expose your 11-year-old
son to risk of sexual perversion, then you're open-minded and noble.
What
else are we to take from the story of Desmond Napoles? Napoles is an
11-year-old boy who dresses in drag for national press, and
who was squired — presumably by his parents — to a gay bar in Brooklyn, New
York, called 3 Dollar Bill, where grown men proceeded to hand dollar bills to
him. As writer Matt Walsh has pointed out, were Desmond a girl being paraded by
her parents before the leering stares of grown men, child protective services
would be called. But since Desmond is a celebrity who has been exploited by his
parents, this is all worth celebrating.
Which
is, perhaps, one of the reasons so many religious parents don't want the state
of New York determining what they should and should not be allowed to teach
their children. Religious parents may look at the world created by the social
left and say that they want to inculcate in their children an alternative set
of values. There may be costs to that. Perhaps there are ways to mitigate those
costs. But overall, only one set of parents is being punished for making
"educational" decisions by the state of New York — and it's not the
set of parents cross-dressing their pre-pubescent children for fun and cash.
Norb Leahy, Dunwoody
GA Tea Party Leader
No comments:
Post a Comment