Backward Mapping: Bundling Human and
Social Engineering While Trumpeting International Competition
Sometimes people feel deeply shaken by the things I write
about. Me too, except there is no ambiguity in what is being sought by the
time I am willing to discuss it in public. If the declarations appear to
be Tragic or even just a horrifically wasteful idea, someone needs to be
bringing these intentions into the sunlight of public scrutiny in time. So
after an admittedly needed rest to watch the sand and surf and mull over the
enormity of the materials I have, here we go again.
I must say though I was relieved to learn as I pondered the
implications of today’s disclosures that the late UK economist, Kenneth
Minogue, had also been distressed by what was being intentionally done to
the minds and personalities of people in order to force the acceptance of
the welfare state and equality for all. His 2010 book The Servile Mind
noted that in the 21st century “large areas of what were previously of private
concern have become subject to political regulation.” Amen to that from
this side of the Atlantic pond. He pointed out that “new pieties have arisen
according to which individuals are able to demonstrate their decency by
the political attitudes they adopt.”
Having just finished reading http://www.competencyworks.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/CW-An-International-Study-in-Competency-Education-Postcards-from-Abroad-October-2014.pdf released two days ago, I would word that much more strongly
than Minogue did. Globally those desired attitudes are simply being declared
a necessary Competency or disposition. Then learning experiences are
created to make sure the desired changes in personal outlooks occur. Minogue
noted a “coercive centralism of attitude and policy.” I agree, but how few
recognize that has become the new purpose of K-12 curriculum and what is
actually being assessed? Minogue reminded us that historically in the US
and the elsewhere in the West individuals “constructed their own identity
in terms of personally chosen commitments.”
Not in the Competency vision. It is purely grounded in a
belief that in the 21st Century, all over the world, government officials
at all levels get to pick out the desired “sentiment and belief [that] can
be adequately entrenched in the human mind” in order to “determine conduct”
in the manner desired for the new vision of society and the economy laid
out. Political power is now mandating in advance what is to be acceptable
individual behavior, beliefs, and values. Since that sounds unabashedly
authoritarian to anyone with a modicum of history knowledge, the same
goals get hidden under an invisibility cloak with terms like standards,
learning, or Competency.
Or ‘entrepreneurship’ in UNESCO’s recent report called Toward
an Entrepreneurial Culture for the Twenty-First Century. Backward Mapping
is a term used to describe the desired quality, attribute, sentiment, or
behavior to be instilled through school experiences in a student. It sounds
much better than political engineering of a person’s personality and
behavior, but those are the true aims if we can just be blunt and honest.
Saves time and wasteful use of taxpayer dollars. Here’s a sample of what I
mean from that UNESCO report:
“Across nations, what is needed [in K-12 and all approaches
to economic and social development] are programmes that show young people
how they can directly contribute to raising levels of well-being and prosperity
in their communities. Preparation starts in the classroom where students,
future workers, business owners and community members must learn how to be responsible citizens.”
That’s the vision that K-12 education must now engineer,
which would certainly explain the need for a student-centered behavioral
approach instead of the traditional subject-matter emphasis. It also
explains why we just keep running into a required communitarian orientation
that students are to demonstrate daily. Again UNESCO reminds us that “education
is not only acquiring academic knowledge but the way to prepare young people
for work and living in the society.” Of course that would be the new view of
society so we are Backward Mapping twice. Desired Society needs a certain
kind of citizen with a stipulated Outlook on what is desirable for the
future. That type of citizen then gets sculpted via K-12 Whole Child focused
education. No intention though to confess all this to the parents or
taxpayers.
What’s important is the Goal of Equity and “a decent quality
of growth for all.” Now I think all this is delusional, but this is in fact
what Competency globally is tied to as well as those Common Core standards
when rightfully understood in the supporters’ own words. If this social and
economic vision is deranged, then we are implementing a tragic form of behavioral
engineering for ridiculous ends in our schools, and nobody is supposed to
have a veto power to stop the shift in time. Please read the End Game while mentally
humming “To Dream the Impossible Dream” to add to the context. To give our
mayors, city councils, and community organizers, not to mention district
School Supers, ever more power over people and places, this is all to occur at
the level of “local governments.”
“…rests on finding a balance between economic, social and
environmental goals. This requires dialogue
and partnerships through which different stakeholders work together for their broad range of concerns. [Won’t the new real world
problem-based focus for high school come in handy?] And while this may not
always be as effective as desired [that’s OK because taxpayer dollars can
always be levied again since they come from a magic tree surrounded by unicorns],
there are at least greater civil
society inputs into strategies
to maintain social cohesion to
protect cultural identity and to promote environmentally friendly behaviours
in local communities. Putting the future of the community in the hands of
its own members reduces dependency on outside forces and rejuvenates the
economic and social fabric.”
Now would be a good time to transition to the song “Sunshine,
Lollipops, and Rainbows” because, as I said, that’s a ridiculous vision. A
rational mind filled with facts and attuned to making its own decisions and
setting its own goals would grasp that easily, which is precisely why such
minds are being disallowed all over the globe. They are in the way of the
desired all-encompassing exercise of political power in the 21st Century.
That reality again would never be something most people would voluntarily
acquiesce to so we get namby-pamby visions for 21st century education like
this from the same document:
“We learn from a young age that the development of positive,
engaging and equitable relationships
is critical to our success as human
beings. Basic social skills enable us to interact in the community, as well as to understand the meaning of citizenship. Sound
social skills allow us to understand both social rights and claims, as well as obligations and responsibilities.
But imagination and emotional engagement are as important as social
skills. More than ever, there is a need to engage young people in finding creative solutions to improving the
welfare of their communities,
while contributing to collective
prosperity in ways that do not damage natural resources. Intelligence
should include the ability to envisage
alternative futures, to resolve open-ended problems with more than
one way of doing things.”
That’s the vision of society and the economy and our new
future that all the education reforms going on globally in both public and
private schools are driving towards. There is absolutely no ambiguity whatsoever
in what is being sought and why. The only fluctuation seems to be where in
the progression a given school, district, or country is.
I am going to close this post with the open declaration
of one of the insiders who brags about her access and tutoring of Fortune
100 CEOs and Pentagon officials and her desire to use education to gain
new kinds of nonlinear minds to get a new kind of society. In her 2010 book
Rebecca Costa wrote that “we have to challenge [the human brain] in very specific
ways. And we are getting very close to understanding exactly what those ways
are. Word by word, we are now constructing a user’s manual to the human
brain–ground zero for everything
we do, know, think, and feel–and the sustainability of human progress.”
Told you there was no ambiguity and no, we are apparently
not supposed to get a copy of that user’s manual. Fortunately for all of
us, I found it anyway and laid it out in my book originally. I continue to
explore it on this blog.
We can only stop what we know exists. The creators of that
user’s manual and these visions of the future never wanted us to link K-12
reforms to what was really the End Game in time. Tough luck I say.
Related Posts
-
Source:http://agenda21news.com/2014/10/backward-mapping-bundling-human-social-engineering-trumpeting-international-competition/CommentsWe need to quit the U.N. They are not helpful and they are intent on infringing on our rights and our individual sovereignty. We need to replace most of our elected officials before it’s too late.Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader
No comments:
Post a Comment