Houston Demands Oversight of Sermons
Campaign against pastors called 'Big Brother overlords' on a
'witch hunt' by Bob Unrah
Officials with the city of Houston, Texas, who are fighting
for a controversial ordinance that would allow men to use women’s restrooms
there now have demanded to see the sermons preached by several area pastors.
The recent move came in a subpoena
from the city to pastors for copies of their sermons – and copies of other
communications from the pastors to their congregations – in the city’s fight over a
“non-discrimination” plan that allows “gender-confused” people to use whatever
public restrooms with which they identify.
A legal action challenging the city’s move has developed
because the city allegedly violated its own charter in the process of adopting
the Equal Rights Ordinance, which in May designated homosexuals and transgender
persons as a protected class.
Critics say the measure effectively enables sexual predators
who dress as women to enter female public bathrooms, locker rooms and shower
facilities. And a coalition of activists that includes area pastors filed suit
Aug. 6 against the city and lesbian Mayor Annise Parker after officials
announced a voter petition to repeal the measure didn’t have enough signatures
to qualify for the election ballot.
Parker, who has acknowledged the ordinance is “all about
me,” was legally married to her same-sex partner in California in January.
According to the Alliance Defending
Freedom, which now has filed a
motion to quash the city’s demands:
The motion to the court explains that the pastors are not
party to the lawsuit, and the city’s strategy doesn’t meet the requirements of
state law that demands such efforts “be reasonably calculated to lead to the
discovery of admissible evidence, not be overly broad, seek only information
that is not privileged and relevant to the subject matter of the litigation,
and not cause undue burden or harassment.”
The demands from the city simply fail to meet those
requirements, the motion explains.
But the ADF said, “City officials are upset over a voter
lawsuit filed after the city council rejected valid petitions to repeal a law
that allows members of the opposite sex into each other’s restrooms. ADF
attorneys say the city is illegitimately demanding that the pastors, who are
not party to the lawsuit, turn over their constitutionally protected sermons
and other communications simply so the city can see if the pastors have ever
opposed or criticized the city.”
“City council members are supposed to be public servants,
not ‘Big Brother’ overlords who will tolerate no dissent or challenge,” said
ADF Senior Legal Counsel Erik Stanley. “In this case, they have embarked upon a
witch hunt, and we are asking the court to put a stop to it.”
“The city’s subpoena of sermons and other pastoral communications is both needless and unprecedented,” said ADF Litigation Counsel Christiana Holcomb. “The city council and its attorneys are engaging in an inquisition designed to stifle any critique of its actions. Political and social commentary is not a crime; it is protected by the First Amendment.”
While the public submitted more than three times the legally
required number of petition signatures to require city action, and the city
secretary certified the number as sufficient, the mayor and city attorney
simply “defied” the law and rejected the certification, the ADF said.
“The message is clear: oppose the decisions of city
government, and drown in unwarranted, burdensome discovery requests,” said a
brief in support of the motion to quash. “These requests, if allowed, will have
a chilling effect on future citizens who might consider circulating referendum
petitions because they are dissatisfied with ordinances passed by the city
council.
“Not only will the nonparty pastors be harmed if these
discovery requests are allowed, but the people will suffer as well. The
referendum process will become toxic and the people will be deprived of an
important check on city government provided them by the charter.”
WND
has reported that similar measures in other
jurisdictions across the country have sparked controversy. Opponents point to
incidents such a
man in Indianapolis who allegedly went into a women’s locker room at a YMCA and
watched girls, ages 7 and 10, shower.
The Houston case came about on the work of a coalition
including the Baptist Ministers Association of Houston, the Houston Area Pastor
Council, the Houston Ministers against Crime, AME Ministers Alliance of
Houston/Gulf Coast, the Northeast Ministers Alliance, the South Texas Full
Gospel Baptist Fellowship, the South Texas District of the Assemblies of God
and the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference.
The coalition had submitted more than 55,000 signatures in
the referendum drive. City Secretary Anna Russell confirmed in writing Aug. 1
that the petition sponsors had submitted 17,846 qualified signatures, nearly
600 above the minimum 17,269.
However, City Attorney David Feldman announced 2,750
petitions were invalid because of “technical problems.”
Opponents have argued Feldman did not have the authority to
step in and make the decision, and that it should have been handled by the
courts.
Critics dubbed the Houston law the “sexual predator
protection act,” claiming that by designating transgender or gender-confused
persons as a protected class, women and children are threatened by predators
seeking to exploit the ordinance’s ambiguous language.
Political activist Steven F. Hotze said the ordinance would
establish minority status for transvestites, allowing men who dress as women to
enter women’s public bathrooms, locker rooms and shower facilities.
“I want to protect my wife, daughters and granddaughters
from being exposed to the dangers of male sexual predators masquerading as
women in women’s public bathrooms and other facilities,” he said. “This is why
it has been called the Sexual Predators’ Protection Act.”
Similar fights also have erupted in Maryland, Florida and
Colorado, which adopted a radical “transgender nondiscrimination” bill in 2008
that makes it illegal to deny a person access to public accommodations,
including restrooms and locker rooms, based on gender identity or the
“perception” of gender identity. One consequence of the law is a ruling forcing
authorities to permit 6-year-old Coy Mathis – a boy who says he thinks he’s a
girl – to use the girls bathroom at his elementary school.
Nationwide, 17 states and the
District of Columbia have embraced the transsexual agenda. Rhode Island added
“gender identity and expression” to its anti-discrimination law in June with
the support of Gov. Jack Markell, and Delaware Attorney General Beau Biden
announced his support in an Equality
Delaware video.
But other attempts to advance the transsexual agenda were
defeated in Montana, Missouri, North Dakota and New York, where state Senate
leaders refused to allow a vote.
Here what happened in Washington state:
The Obama administration is
solidly behind the move to open locker room doors to some members of the
opposite sex.
- President Obama signed the U.N. Declaration on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity;
- The White House hosted the first-ever meeting with transgender activists;
- The Department of State made it easier for transsexuals to change the sex indicated on passports;
- The U.S. Justice Department sided with a transsexual individual in an employment discrimination suit against the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives;
- The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ruled for the first time last year that “gender identity or expression” in the workplace is protected under federal civil rights law;
- The Office of Personnel Management inserted “gender identity” for the first time into its federal workplace anti-discrimination policy;
- The American Psychiatric Association removed “gender identity disorder” from its list of mental health ailments in late 2012, a move some regarded as a lifting of the social stigma attached to transsexual behavior.
Source: http://www.wnd.com/2014/10/major-u-s-city-demands-oversight-of-sermons/
No comments:
Post a Comment