The Binge, the Bartender and the Austrian Hangover Theory by
Charles Goyette
That was quite a binge, quantitative easing was. A bender
that went on for years. Now comes the hangover. Just like the Austrian school
economists said. In fact, the reason the Austrian Business Cycle Theory is
sometimes called the Austrian "hangover" theory is becoming all too clear.
Interest rates are said to coordinate production across
time. Normally in a free market when people choose to save more money, the lower
rates that result incentivize businesses to carry out longer-term capital goods
expenditures for future production.
On the other hand when rates rise, businesses, factoring in
the higher borrowing costs, are less likely to engage in long-term expansion.
That's a good thing because the high rates mean that consumers — the final
objective of all economic activity — don't have the liquidity to afford all the
new production of the expansion.
It is a natural and wholesome dynamic. High rates encourage
the savings that the economy needs for longer-term production to eventually
take place, while low rates normally reveal that consumers are not in a hurry
to consume today.
The stock market is the most visible part of this biggest of
all bubbles.
Businesses read the buildup of savings reflected by low
rates as evidence that their longer-term production will be met by consumers
whose saving will enable them to afford the new production.
But sometimes the central bank bartender steps in and spikes
the punch bowl. It prints money electronically so that it can buy bonds and
artificially drive rates lower.
Having drunk from the Fed's spiked punch bowl, people become
intoxicated. It affects their vision and their judgment. The party gets lively
and businesses start wearing lampshades on their heads. In the raucous environment,
homebuilders, high on cheap money, are likely to start building homes in the
suburbs of desert cities like Las Vegas and Phoenix, far beyond the sustainable
growth of the market or the means of people to pay for them all.
And that is exactly what happened.
If businesses, intoxicated by low rates, start wearing
lampshades, markets can be described as swinging from the chandeliers. In the
general inebriation the markets race higher, setting new records. But then the
punch runs out and the hangover starts with the inevitable correction in prices.
And that is exactly what has happened over and over again
with quantitative easing. When QE I
ended, the market sold off. After a 14 percent drop in the stock markets, the
Fed bought drinks all around. A lot of drinks.
QE II was much bigger than QE I. But when it ended, the
market sold off. Again.
QE III was the biggest bacchanalia of all. It has blown the
Fed's balance sheet up past $4 trillion.
One day in June 2013, Ben Bernanke threatened, not to take
away the punch bowl all at once, but to just slowly begin watering down the QE
III drinks. The Dow Industrials fell more than 200 points that day alone, while
the S&P 500 fell even more as a percentage. Altogether that summer the Dow
fell almost 1,000 points from its May high to its June low.
The terrifying truth Washington won't tell you
America's economy is on the road to ruin. The actions you
take now — before this house of cards collapses around us — will determine how well you and your family
will weather the coming financial
cataclysm ... and also how rich you'll be for decades to come.
In December last year the Fed met again. This time it
announced that it would reduce its liquidity operation by $10 billion a month
beginning in January 2014.
The stock market threw a fit and the Dow fell more than
1,200 points from Dec. 31 to the beginning of February.
Now QE III is ending and the early signs of the hangover
began appearing in the market selloff last week.
But hope springs eternal and it only took a comment from one
Fed official to convince the market that the liquor would not stop flowing. It
was "hair of the dog" time! Another drink and all will be well!
It is not pleasant, but it's time to face reality. The economy
and markets have been intoxicated. In fact they are chronically drunk and the
Fed is their enabler. They must get into detox. Unsustainable projects must
stop. Mal-investments must be liquidated. Markets must return to normal — it's called
a "correction" for a reason.
The monetary manipulation must end, and the mal-investments
must be confronted so that resources again move to sustainable economic
activities.
This is why the economy has never really recovered, despite
the unprecedented creation of trillions of dollars and zero interest rate
policies. The Fed's activity interferes with crucial price signals so that
investors are misled and capital is misallocated. It interferes with long-term
economic planning, encourages speculative activity at the expense of productive
investment even as it penalizes the risk-averse investor, typically the elderly.
Will the Fed break open the liquor cabinets again? Bank of
America/Merrill Lynch speculates that a ten percent sell-off would be
sufficiently painful for the Fed to turn to the bottle again. Others disagree.
I have spelled out my own view in the Freedom and Prosperity
Letter. For reasons having to do with criticism from both the Bank for International Settlements and
the International Monetary Fund, as well
as having to do with the Fed's credibility and the credibility of the dollar itself, I suspect the Fed will not be
so quick to start up another round.
It is an interesting debate, but we cannot know the answer
for sure. Fed officials are divided among themselves and they don't know what
to do. They are making it all up as they go along.
But there are some things we can know. And that brings us
back to capital goods: Machinery, buildings, raw materials used in production, plants
and equipment.
Consumer spending can turn on a dime. A decision to spend a
week at an expensive new luxury resort or to buy a new car can be made on a
weekend. But expanding that resort to accommodate all the new guests, or expanding the new car plant to keep up with
the added demand created by artificially
low rates, those things require longer term planning and commitments. Then, if consumer spending
patterns change — too bad!
The intoxicant of loose money since 2009 has been spiking
capital goods orders. This is an indication to many that a real recovery may at
long last finally be at hand. But Austrian school economist Frank Shostak,
writing recently in Mises Daily, warns that even bubble activities, "like
any non-bubble activity, also require tools and machinery (i.e., capital
goods)."
Shostak's analysis is that "a down-trend in the growth
momentum of the money supply since October 2011 is currently on the verge of
asserting its dominance. This means that various bubble activities are likely
to come under pressure. Slower monetary growth is going to slow down the
diversion of real wealth to them from wealth generating activities.
"Consequently capital goods orders are going to come
under pressure in the months ahead. The build-up of a wrong infrastructure is
going to slow down — and fewer pyramids will be built." If Shostak is right, it means that the United
States will soon join in the economic slowdown that is taking place in China
and the recessions that are growing in Europe and Japan.
That means that just as the prior dot com and housing
bubbles eventually popped, the air is beginning to come out of the QE
bubble. When this process begins, no
amount of money printing and not even a few good stiff drinks from Janet Yellen
will be able to stop it or to re-inflate the bubble.
The stock market is the most visible part of this biggest of
all bubbles. It could prove to be the biggest of all hangovers.
Source:
moneyandmarkets.com
Comments
The stock market would settle back 30% to reflect our real
economy, but it also takes inflation into account, which would add those
cheaper dollars into the mix. The
economic fundamentals are not good. The long term trend of global consumer
wealth decline will have its affect.
Regulatory and
Tax reform will be needed to reactivate free markets.
Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader
No comments:
Post a Comment