*UPDATE*
‘Pelletier II’: Sisters seized from parents in AZ, subjected to destructive
medical regimen by J.E. Dyer on
October 11, 2014 at 6:25 pm
America needs to wake up to the
contempt in which the people and their parental rights are held by too many
agencies of our governments.
Information
about another case in Phoenix, like Justina
Pelletier’s in Boston, has emerged recently, and the
concern in both cases is comprehensive. It’s not just that parental
rights are dismissed as meaningless. It’s that the “authority” of
government is the highest priority, over the visibly obvious welfare – rather,
the destruction to the welfare – of the children.
A principle is
upheld in each case: that government authority must prevail, no matter what the
cost to the children involved.
The new case I
refer to is that of Kayla
and Hannah Diegel – 14 and 10, respectively – who,
like Justina Pelletier, have a very rare genetic disorder. Theirs is
called a “congenital disorder of glycosylation,” which interferes with
metabolism. The Inquisitr adds:
Both also have
gastroparesis, which is paralysis of the stomach muscles, and dysmotility of
the colon. They have [been] fed through feeding tubes for some time, because
their systems couldn’t process solid food adequately. With the feeding tubes,
the sisters were able to gain weight and thrive.
In December
2013, the Diegel girls were seen by a physician involved with TGen
and the Human Genome Project, and were the subjects of consultations which included Dr.
Philip James, reportedly a recent transfer to Phoenix from the hospital in
Boston that seized Justina Pelletier from her parents. (Note: online
research identifies a Dr. Philip M. James with the same genetics-related
credentials practicing in pediatric medicine in both Boston and Phoenix.
It’s not clear whether the same Dr. Philip James has transferred full time to
Phoenix. A reader comment at one of the source sites for this post
suggests that may not be the case, so I want to clarify that.)
In the wake of
that referral, Melissa Diegel, the girls’ mother, was directed through a series
of sometimes-mysterious referrals to a doctor the Diegels had never seen or
heard of before at Phoenix Children’s Hospital, who on 10 January 2014 referred
the sisters to Dr. Philip James. (A detailed timeline is posted at this
website. See also Health
Impact News.)
The sisters saw
Dr. James in early February. After they had seen James, the girls’
primary GI doctor, who had overseen their feeding tubes for some time, became
difficult to contact and ceased his proactive management of their feeding-tube
regimen.
The younger
girl, Hannah, developed a severe bowel impaction, and had to be admitted to the
hospital at the end of March. Kayla, the older sister, developed a severe
bowel impaction as well, and was admitted to the hospital on 2 April.
Six days later,
on 8 April, Hannah was seized from her mother by Child Protective
Services. On 10 April, Kayla was seized by CPS. As wards of the
state, Kayla and Hannah were entered, without parental consent, into a drug
trial for congenital disorders of glycosylation sponsored by TGen and the Human
Genome Project’s parent organization, the National Human Genome Research
Institute (NHGRI).
On the
drug-trial regimen, the girls – who were of normal size before, due to
nutrition management with their feeding tubes – have lost significant amounts
of weight. In foster care, without feeding tubes, Kayla has lost 25% of
her body weight, and Hannah 17%. These figures alone should be alarming,
but the Parents Rights Blog (last link above) adds this ominous information:
In fact the
older child’s body fat level has neared 0% and she is said to have a vitamin
deficiency that is so severe that it allows easy severe bruising as noted on
her thighs, arms, legs and possible chest area.
Melissa Diegel, previously unaware that her daughters had been put in the drug trial, finally discovered that in early August. She asked Phoenix Children’s Hospital about the matter, but has received no response. A short time before the flood of recent stories on the Diegels’ situation began to emerge, Melissa’s visitation rights were abruptly terminated, and she was ordered by an Arizona judge to remove from social media all the updates she had been posting on her daughters and their predicament.
Melissa Diegel, previously unaware that her daughters had been put in the drug trial, finally discovered that in early August. She asked Phoenix Children’s Hospital about the matter, but has received no response. A short time before the flood of recent stories on the Diegels’ situation began to emerge, Melissa’s visitation rights were abruptly terminated, and she was ordered by an Arizona judge to remove from social media all the updates she had been posting on her daughters and their predicament.
Note: as with the websites from which the information here is
drawn, this post was NOT compiled with any assistance from Melissa
Diegel. Other bloggers copied information from Ms. Diegel’s posts before
she removed them, per the court order. See especially the Facebook page A Miracle for Two Sisters.
This past week,
the CASA worker for the Diegel girls – the court-appointed special advocate –
quit her job, because she had been threatened by the Department of Child Safety
when she posed concerns about the girls’ medical regimen and treatment in
foster care.
The
drug-trial link
The sites
advocating for the Diegel girls have focused on the drug-trial aspect of their
seizure by public authorities – and that is important. For one
thing, it ties the Diegels’ situation to Justina Pelletier’s, which also
involved a rare genetic defect, and medical research without parental consent
(possibly connected, as suggested above and at the links, to some of the same
researchers).
It also ties
the Diegel case to that of a teenage boy, Isaiah Rider, who was seized
from his parents while at Lurie Children’s Hospital in Chicago – for a similar drug trial, also in April 2014. As
outlined at the Parents Rights Blog, the separate drug trials – which both
received federal funding – opened on the same day, 14 March 2014. Within
the next month, the three children had been seized from their parents and
entered in the trials without their parents’ consent.
The
most important principle
But I urge
readers to recognize that no child could be entered without his parents’
consent into a drug trial if the state didn’t collude with the doctors
and researchers involved to seize children from their parents. It’s the
government agencies that are the problem here. If you want, as I do, to
take corrective action on these situations, it’s not the drug companies or the
research institutes you need to attack. It’s the government agencies,
which are the only ones that have the power to coerce the parents.
I’m disgusted
too by the idea of using children as guinea pigs. Seeing humans in that
light is a growing pathology among our leaders and our most “educated” elite,
like scientists and physicians. (My last post covered the topic of “big
data,” and the pseudo-clinical,
data-oriented view of humanity adopted by too many of the same aspiring
technocrats: people in leadership positions who want to experiment on human
beings as if we’re a soulless collective “system.”)
But the most
important public policy issue here – the one we can most effectively do
something about – is the appalling ease with which hospitals can just get child-services
agencies to seize children from their parents.
If we correct
that problem, all the rest of them will fall in line. Fathers and mothers
will have the proper authority to protect their children from abuse in medical
research, and it won’t do conscience-deficient researchers any good to have an
immoral attitude about their subjects.
If we don’t
correct the state-vs.-parental-authority problem, on the other hand, it won’t
matter what else we do. A nation that doesn’t respect parental rights
cannot protect its children, period. There will be no recourse for anyone
against the predatory attitudes of immoral people about their fellow humans.
Please don’t
lose sight of that. This isn’t about wanting to stop drug-trial sponsors
and researchers, repellent as some of their attitudes may be. It’s about
the state’s respect for the individual and the rights of parents. That’s
the first and most important thing we have to correct our course on.
**UPDATE**
Megyn Kelly has picked
up on this story. We
can hope that will kickstart an appropriate level of interest from Arizona
officials. Moreover, Health Impact News has a
new post up outlining additional, highly
questionable child seizures from the same hospital, Phoenix Children’s
Hospital. The HIN group has been receiving a flood of such stories from
parents since coming out with the Diegel sisters’ story. Arizona
apparently has the highest incidence of child seizures (of all kinds) and
foster placements in the nation. The second post is well worth the read.
It includes an interview done with Melissa Diegel, the Diegel girls’
mother.
Source: http://libertyunyielding.com/2014/10/11/pelletier-ii-sisters-seized-parents-az-subjected-destructive-medical-regimen/
No comments:
Post a Comment