Friday, December 19, 2014

Oyster Farm Abuse


Drakes Bay oyster farm closes doors after long wilderness struggle
Posted on December 18, 2014 Written by Frank DuBois, thewesterner.blogspot.com
Frank DuBois, past NM Sec. of Agri­cul­ture, for­mer leg­isla­tive assis­tant to a U.S. Sen­a­tor, and a Deputy Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Interior.
It’s the end of the line for Drake’s Bay Oys­ter Co. On Dec. 31, after a long bat­tle with the National Park Ser­vice, the Cal­i­for­nia Coastal Com­mis­sion, the Depart­ment of the Inte­rior and wilder­ness advo­cates, owner Kevin Lunny and his fam­ily will vacate the starkly beau­ti­ful Drake’s Estero, a 2,500-acre estu­ary where some of the tasti­est oys­ters on the West Coast have been farmed for more than half a century.
A 40-year lease agree­ment between the feds and the oys­ter farm’s orig­i­nal own­ers has expired. For­mer Inte­rior Sec­re­tary Ken Salazar could have extended the lease for a decade, which was allowed by 2009 leg­is­la­tion that Demo­c­ra­tic U.S. Sen. Dianne Fein­stein spon­sored. But in 2011, Salazar — fear­ing a pol­icy prece­dent — decided that wilder­ness and oys­ter farm­ing were mutu­ally exclu­sive. Lunny, 56, whose fam­ily runs the first organic-certified beef ranch in Cal­i­for­nia, lost a fight between forces usu­ally on the same side: sus­tain­able farm­ing enthu­si­asts and environmentalists.
Lunny thought he had a fair shot to renew the lease because ranch­ers in other parts of the pro­tected seashore were suc­cess­ful in doing so. To Lunny sup­port­ers, the bad guy was the gov­ern­ment, schem­ing to take away a pre­cious local mar­i­cul­ture resource.
To the farm’s oppo­nents, the Lun­nys became the vil­lains. Found­ing mem­bers of Marin County’s sus­tain­able food move­ment, they were trashed as recal­ci­trant, water-polluting moochers who would exploit (and ruin) one of Marin County’s most beau­ti­ful seascapes.
In some ways, Drake’s Bay Oys­ter Co. is a casu­alty of hard­en­ing atti­tudes about human intru­sion into wilder­ness. In 1962, Con­gress cre­ated Point Reyes National Seashore, a wind-swept coast­line that feels remote despite its loca­tion an hour north of San Fran­cisco. Four­teen years later, Pres­i­dent Ford signed the Point Reyes Wilder­ness Act, encom­pass­ing Drake’s Estero, which was des­ig­nated as a “poten­tial wilder­ness” because it con­tained a com­mer­cial enterprise.
But was the oys­ter com­pany really meant to dis­ap­pear at the end of its lease? In 2011, retired leg­is­la­tors who helped estab­lish the Point Reyes National Seashore told Inte­rior Sec­re­tary Salazar that they had always intended for the oys­ter farm to stay in busi­ness. “The issue of what to do with the oys­ter farm wasn’t even under con­tention,” for­mer Rep. John Bur­ton told the Marin Inde­pen­dent Jour­nal. “Sev­eral things were grand­fa­thered in, and aqua­cul­ture — oys­ter cul­ture — was one of them.”…more
Notice the method used:  First des­ig­nate a National Seashore and then come in later with a Wilder­ness des­ig­na­tion.  A sim­i­lar model is now in place for the arid West:  First des­ig­nate a National Mon­u­ment and then when the time is ripe hit us with Wilder­ness.

In the case above they denied the per­mit because of the “pol­icy prece­dent” it would set.  It would have allowed a com­mer­cial enter­prise, i.e. peo­ple, to con­tinue exist­ing.  Once the per­mit is denied and the oys­ter farm is gone, it will no longer be “poten­tial wilderness” but will become Wilder­ness, which was the goal all along.
Related Posts

No comments: