BREAKING: United Nations Makes Major
Move… This Is THEFT, Posted on December 18, 2014 Written
by conservativetribune.com
FA Note: The brouhaha about
climate change has ALWAYS been about wealth redistribution: THEFT.
United Nations climate negotiators found themselves at
an impasse during a ten-day conference in Lima, Peru this month when the
world’s second-largest economy — the United States — refused to subsidize
the carbon
dioxide emission reductions of
the world’s largest economy — China.
Yes, there is some dispute about which of those two countries
really
has the larger economy — it’s all in
how you measure it — but reverse them if you want and it still won’t make
any sense.
The basic fact of the matter is that delegates to the conference
will be unlikely to reach any sort of agreement unless it includes a
jaw-dropping amount of wealth redistribution.
“We are upset that 2011, 2012, 2013 – three consecutive
years – the developed world provided $10 billion each year for climate
action support to the developing world, but now they have reduced it. Now
they are saying $10 billion is for four years, so it is $2.5 billion,” India delegate
to the U.N. Prakash Javadekar told The Guardian, according to a report
from Eagle Rising.
Javadekar has obviously taken a page from the liberal playbook
— whatever unearned charity you’re given, complain that it’s nowhere near
enough.
Similar negotiations in Warsaw, Poland, last year to
find a way to limit “warming to 2 degrees Celsius by 2100″ ended with no
agreement, and for similar reasons when the U.S. and other nations argued
against climate “reparations.”
That caused delegates from China and other nations to participate
in a “massive walkout,” according to the report.
Which was probably the best thing that could possibly
have happened to those negotiations, in retrospect.
Apparently, “some observers” were actually dumb enough to
think that this year’s conference might end differently because “the U.S.
and China (had already) pledged to curb carbon dioxide emissions in the coming years.”
Except that that hasn’t happened.
President Barack Obama promised China that the U.S. would
reduce emissions by at least 26 percent in the next ten years and China
promised to keep increasing emissions until 2030.
Seriously. That was the agreement. China’s emissions
would “peak” in 2030, implying that five years after the U.S. had met its
goal, China might be willing to talk about reducing its own carbon dioxide
emissions.
Only among leftist diplomats could such an agreement ever
be considered a “reduction.”
Meanwhile, other delegates are basically saying to the
West, show me the money.
“How many CoPs (Conference of the Parties) will it take
for us to really see any tangible results? We have been going from CoP to CoP
and every time we are given so many assurances, and expectations are raised,
but the gaps are getting wider,” Maldivian diplomat Ahmed Sareer
whined.
“There has been a clear commitment of $100 billion a year
but how are we really being offered?” he told The Guardian. “Even when they
make those pledges how do we know how much is going to materialize? There is
no point of knowing that behind the wall there is a big source of funds available
unless we can reach it.”
In other words: money first, reduced emissions later.
As the old joke says, I think we’ve established what Sareer
is. Now we’re just haggling over price.
Meanwhile, according to Eagle
Rising, the conference is likely to end
“without having made any real progress toward a treaty to reduce global
warming.”
For the United States, that might be the best news
of all.
Related Posts
-
Source:http://agenda21news.com/2014/12/breaking-united-nations-makes-major-move-theft/#more-4199
No comments:
Post a Comment