The Syrian civil war has
caused 3.5 million refugees, with more than 350,000 being targeted by the
United Nations for resettlement outside the region.
Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., has sent a
letter to Secretary of State John Kerry
demanding information about the reported pending move of dozens of foreign
refugees from Syria, North Africa and elsewhere into South Carolina.
Gowdy is chairman of the House Judiciary Subcommittee
responsible for the refugee resettlement program overseen by the State
Department. Yet, he says in the letter, he was kept totally in the dark about
the proposed resettlement of refugees into his own district in Spartanburg,
South Carolina.
Ann Corcoran, a longtime watchdog
over the refugee program and author of the Refugee Resettlement
Watch blog, says Gowdy is the first
member of Congress to demand answers to basic questions about this program
since she took up her crusade eight years ago to expose secrecy, fraud and lax
oversight in the program.
The program has flown under the
radar for more than 25 years but controversy flared in February when a top FBI
counter-terrorism official, Michael Steinbach, testified before the House
Homeland Security committee and said the U.S. has no way to vet the Syrian
refugees for possible connections to the Islamic State, also called ISIS, and
other terrorist organizations. As
WND reported, Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Texas, sent
a letter to the White House Jan. 28 citing “serious national security concerns”
about the Syrian refugee program and imploring Obama to not let it become a
“back door for jihadists.”
In fact, dozens of Islamic refugees from Iraq, Somalia and
other countries have already been charged and convicted of providing material
support to foreign terrorist organizations while others have left the country
to fight for ISIS in Syria and al-Shabaab in Somalia.
Now, Gowdy has taken the fight for information on exactly
how this program works to a new level, demanding answers for the Spartanburg
resettlement from none other than John Kerry.
But he needs to go one step further, Corcoran said. As
chairman of the subcommittee charged with overseeing this program, Gowdy must
demand answers for the communities in all 49 states that participate in the
U.S. refugee program, not just his own state or district. That would require
holding hearings, she said, because this issue affects communities across the
U.S., not just Spartanburg.
“Maybe due to Gowdy’s swift and decisive action, other
communities, which are being kept in the dark, will get some relief,” she said.
“This is the first time I’ve ever seen anyone in Congress do this. Trey Gowdy
has directed a letter to John Kerry asking all the right questions.”
The U.S. has been taking in an average of about 70,000
refugees per year over the past few years. The refugees are placed in housing
and schools and given free healthcare. They are put on a fast track toward full
U.S. citizenship, often within five years.
Gowdy has asked Kerry to provide answers on how Spartanburg
was selected for the opening of a new resettlement office to be operated by
World Relief. He wants to know when the refugees will arrive, how many, and
from what countries. He also demanded to know what services will be required,
the cost, and how much of the cost will be charged to the federal government.
This is an issue that affects almost
every state. The U.S. State Department works with the United Nations to
resettle refugees into every state except Wyoming. Charitable organizations
such as World Relief, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, Lutheran
Immigration and Refugee Service, the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, Church World
Services, Episcopal Migration Ministries and the International Rescue Committee
operate resettlement offices in 190
communities across the U.S. All of these
are private charitable agencies but they receive millions of dollars in federal
grants to support their efforts.
WND requested comment from Gowdy Tuesday morning.
“We don’t have any comment at this point beyond our letter
sent yesterday,” said Gowdy’s press secretary, Amanda Duvall.
Last
week WND reported on the secretive nature of the
process in which cities and towns are chosen for the resettlement of foreign
refugees, many of them Muslims from areas known to be in upheaval fighting ISIS
and other terrorist organizations. Syria, Somalia, Afghanistan and Iraq, for
example, all have devolved into civil sectarian strife, causing the
displacement of large numbers of people. Many Christians have been driven from
their homes in Iraq and Syria, yet the U.S. has been taking in mostly Muslims
from these countries.
And the FBI is not the only intelligence operation warning
about the strong likelihood that ISIS will send its militants to Western
countries posing as “refugees.”
The Norway’s Police Intelligence
Service said in November 2014 that its main concern was individuals misusing
the refugee system to bring Syria’s violence to Norway, reported
the Nordic Page.
Refugee resettlements are conducted in the U.S. by nine
private agencies that contract with the U.S. government, and six of the nine
have religious affiliations. These nine contractors in turn subcontract with
more than 350 other charitable organizations and churches.
The Honorable John Kerry Secretary U.S. Department of State
2201 C Street, NW Washington, DC 20520
Dear Secretary Kerry,
I write regarding the potential
resettlement of refugees to the Spartanburg, South Carolina, area. It has been
reported by media outlets, and confirmed by staff within your Department’s
Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration (PRM), that a resettlement agency
submitted a proposal to open an office in Spartanburg. In addition, it is my
understanding that the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) approved the
request to resettle a certain number of refugees in Spartanburg.
As the Member of the U.S. House
of Representatives representing the Spartanburg area, I am deeply concerned
about the lack of notice, information, and consultation afforded to me and my
constituents about this issue. As such, please provide the information
requested and answers to questions below:
1. Please provide a copy of the
proposal submitted by the resettlement agency and any subsequent correspondence
between your Department and the resettlement agency.
2. When was the resettlement agency’s proposal submitted? When was it approved by USRAP?
3. How were the claims made in the proposal as to Spartanburg’s readiness to resettle refugees verified for accuracy by USRAP prior to approval?
4. What, if any, steps were taken to notify and consult with local government officials (elected or otherwise) prior to the approval of the resettlement proposal? If so, who was contacted and did they approve the proposal?
5. Which officials/employees of the South Carolina State government reviewed and approved the resettlement agency’s proposal? When was such approval given? Were these officials/employees contacted by USRAP to independently ensure approval was given?
6. What types of, and how much, funding will the resettlement agency receive from the federal government? How much of that amount must be provided to the refugees and how much can be kept by the resettlement agency?
7. When are the first refugees expected to arrive in Spartanburg?
8. What federal, state, and local benefits are the refugees entitled to receive a) upon designation as a refugee and b) upon resettlement in the Spartanburg area?
9. How many refugees will be resettled in the Spartanburg area?
10. How are the refugees chosen to resettle in Spartanburg?
11. What is the country of origin of each of the refugees to be resettled in the Spartanburg area?
12. Who is responsible for ensuring housing, employment, and education services for the resettled refugees?
13. Who is responsible for ensuring resettled refugees maintain employment, as opposed to tracking employment for the first few months after being resettled?
14. How many of the refugees to be resettled in the Spartanburg area are of the age to attend K–12 schools? Of those, how many need the local government to provide interpreters or teachers who speak the native language of the refugee for the students?
15. Do any of the refugees to be resettled in the Spartanburg area have criminal convictions? If so, for what crimes has each been convicted?
16. Please explain the background check process performed on refugees scheduled to be resettled in Spartanburg.
17. Will this be the only time refugees will be resettled to the Spartanburg area pursuant to the agency’s proposal? Or can additional refugees be resettled pursuant to the proposal?
2. When was the resettlement agency’s proposal submitted? When was it approved by USRAP?
3. How were the claims made in the proposal as to Spartanburg’s readiness to resettle refugees verified for accuracy by USRAP prior to approval?
4. What, if any, steps were taken to notify and consult with local government officials (elected or otherwise) prior to the approval of the resettlement proposal? If so, who was contacted and did they approve the proposal?
5. Which officials/employees of the South Carolina State government reviewed and approved the resettlement agency’s proposal? When was such approval given? Were these officials/employees contacted by USRAP to independently ensure approval was given?
6. What types of, and how much, funding will the resettlement agency receive from the federal government? How much of that amount must be provided to the refugees and how much can be kept by the resettlement agency?
7. When are the first refugees expected to arrive in Spartanburg?
8. What federal, state, and local benefits are the refugees entitled to receive a) upon designation as a refugee and b) upon resettlement in the Spartanburg area?
9. How many refugees will be resettled in the Spartanburg area?
10. How are the refugees chosen to resettle in Spartanburg?
11. What is the country of origin of each of the refugees to be resettled in the Spartanburg area?
12. Who is responsible for ensuring housing, employment, and education services for the resettled refugees?
13. Who is responsible for ensuring resettled refugees maintain employment, as opposed to tracking employment for the first few months after being resettled?
14. How many of the refugees to be resettled in the Spartanburg area are of the age to attend K–12 schools? Of those, how many need the local government to provide interpreters or teachers who speak the native language of the refugee for the students?
15. Do any of the refugees to be resettled in the Spartanburg area have criminal convictions? If so, for what crimes has each been convicted?
16. Please explain the background check process performed on refugees scheduled to be resettled in Spartanburg.
17. Will this be the only time refugees will be resettled to the Spartanburg area pursuant to the agency’s proposal? Or can additional refugees be resettled pursuant to the proposal?
I request that any plans to
resettle refugees in the Spartanburg, South Carolina, area be placed on hold
until my constituents and I receive your substantive responses to the questions
and information requested in this letter.
Additionally, before moving
forward, both the Spartanburg community and I should have time to substantively
review the information and be comfortable with the information provided.
As previously stated, I am
troubled by the lack of notice and coordination with my office and the
Spartanburg community, particularly local officials, regarding the plans to
resettle refugees in the area. In that vein, I request at least one month’s
notice prior to the arrival of the first refugee in the Spartanburg area.
Please contact my Chief of Staff, Cindy Crick, with such notice (864-241-0175
or cindy.crick@mail.house.gov).
Thank you in advance for your
prompt response and attention to this matter. Sincerely,
Trey Gowdy
Source: http://www.wnd.com/2015/04/congressman-demands-answers-on-influx-of-syrian-refugees/
Comments
Obama and the UN are responsible for
this dangerous refugee invasion. We need
to impeach Obama and quit the UN.
Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party
Leader
No comments:
Post a Comment