Entrenched GOPe Show Their Cards – Construct “Border
Adjustment Tax” To Oppose Trump’s America-First Agenda…Posted on January 17, 2017 by sundance
Anyone who believes Democrats own
exclusive opposition to Donald Trump are completely ignoring the deliberate
construct of the 2015/2016 republican primary. There are just as many -if
not more- natural enemies within the Republican apparatus as there are within
the Democrat group. “America-First” is antithetical to the UniParty.
Again, prior to Donald Trump there
was one party in Washington DC, “The UniParty”. President Donald Trump
represented a second party, an independent approach toward legislative and
economic priority. He was not a third choice, he was the second option.
Within the ‘right-side’ of the
UniParty you have Republicans. Within the republican party there are two
groups; both intentionally established to present the fallacy of false choice.
“Small government CONservatives”,
just like their “big government” GOPe colleagues, begin remarkable advocacy for
the consolidation of self-serving power when
they are threatened by sunlight. It is critical for the U.S. electorate
to understand this dynamic.
Whenever CTH reveals this political
construct, we come under fire from the hidden elements within the UniParty;
most generally from the crony-constitutionalist group represented by the
advocacy of old talk-radio yellers.
A few days ago we highlighted a
maneuver being attempted by the Crony-Constitutionalist group within the DC
UniParty. A specific agenda being put forth by heavily financed
operative, Senator Mike Lee. – READ HERE – Today we highlight the
economic efforts of the second group which synergizes with Lee’s efforts from
the other half of the republican wing of the UniParty.
♦ Senator Mike Lee works to block
taxation on imports by removing the tariff authority of
President Donald Trump. This aids his multinational sponsors on Wall
Street. Senator Lee trying to stop Trump from leveling taxes on imports,
under the false auspices of constitutional authority.
[Made irrelevant by the 1913 passage of the 17th amendment]
♦ Speaker Paul Ryan works to block
taxation on imports by manipulating import taxation into a larger “comprehensive corporate tax bill“,
and establishing the loopholes, constructed by the same multinational
sponsors. Wall Street then utilizes these constructs to avoid the payment
of import taxes. Watch closely:
(Via Wall Street Journal) The measure, known as border
adjustment, would tax imports and exempt exports as part of a broader plan to
encourage companies to locate jobs and production in the U.S. But Mr. Trump, in
his first comments on the subject, called it “too complicated.” –link–
Mike Lee represents the Senate
approach. Speaker Ryan represents the House approach. However, both
approaches are geared toward the same benefactors.
Those benefactors are the lobbyists
who pay Republicans for legislative priorities. Who is that…. Tom Donohue.
For those who don’t know, it is
special interest groups, lawyers as lobbyists like the U.S. CoC, who actually
write the legislation. Politicians vote on legislation, they don’t
actually put pen to paper and write it – that’s what the congressional lobbyists do.
In both taxation constructs above
Mike Lee and Paul Ryan are opposing Donald Trump. Does this example help
to better understand the fallacy of false choice? It’s the same concept as the GOPe splitter
strategy to ensure a specific, controlled and approved ideological candidate
wins the primary.
There’s no difference between John
Cornyn and Kevin McCarthy; they are beholden to the same group. There’s
also no difference between Ted Cruz and Paul Ryan, they too are beholden to the
same corporate interests. That’s why Cruz and Ryan created Trade Promotion Authority together, the
vehicle to pass Donohue’s TPP trade deal.
However, the good news is President
Donald Trump is keenly aware of this political alignment. Heck, he should
be… in many ways his understanding of the ‘fallacy of false choice’ is the
entire reason Donald Trump finally ran for President: “Anytime I hear border adjustment, I don’t love it,” Mr. Trump said in
an interview with The Wall Street Journal on Friday. “Because usually it means
we’re going to get adjusted into a bad deal. That’s what happens.”
Independent
analyses of the Republican tax plan say it would lead the dollar to appreciate
further—which would lower the cost of imported goods, offsetting the effects of
the tax on retailers and others.
In his
interview with the Journal on Friday, Mr. Trump said the U.S. dollar was
already “too strong” in part because China holds down its currency, the yuan.
“Our companies can’t compete with them now because our currency is too strong.
And it’s killing us.”
The yuan
is “dropping like a rock,” Mr. Trump said, dismissing recent Chinese actions to support it as done simply “because
they don’t want us to get angry.”
Mr. Trump
appears to be breaking with a recent tradition of presidents refraining from
comments on the dollar’s level. The dollar is up 4% against a broad basket of currencies since he was
elected, and
roughly 25% since mid-2014.
The
dollar and border adjustment tax are both central issues as Mr. Trump moves to
strengthen U.S. standing in the global economy. (more)
President Trump knows these multi-thousand-page legislative
constructs are filled with loop holes allowing Wall Street’s multinationals to
skirt around direct import taxation. Delayed cargo diversion, via
geographic third party delivery broker, is one method they use to avoid them.
A direct tariff is specific, direct
and generally unavoidable. Wall Street doesn’t like tariffs and
crony-constitutionalists lie about them vociferously.
The opposition groups (Wall Street
Multinationals) who are funding the UniParty endeavors of Mike Lee and Paul
Ryan etc., have a specific desire to keep the U.S. dollar inflated. All
of these multinationals and large economic nations hold trade dollars in their
depositories – it is against their interests to see the dollar drop in
value.Wall Street benefits from a higher dollar – Main Street benefits from a
lower dollar.
A secondary reason Trump wants to
see lower dollar evaluation is because, debt becomes less burdensome when the
value of the U.S. dollar drops. Trump knows how to manage and
leverage debt. Lowering the U.S. debt is critical to economic growth.
Think of it this way. If you
owe $200,000 on your mortgage and earn $40k per year, that debt is
scary. However, if you owe $200k and earn $60k that debt is less
worrying. When the value of the dollar drops, the weight of our debt
burden drops with it because expanding economic growth generates more income to
treasury via tax inflows. This is how dangerous debt can be neutralized and paid
down.
Remember, there are trillions of
globalist dollars at stake – and the DC UniParty, all of it, will fight tooth
and nail on behalf of their benefactors. Patriots will need to respond when we go to
the mattresses.
Comments
The “unity
party”, demo-publican RINOs want to add subsidies in addition to tariffs.
Subsidies are not necessary and they keep the federal budget bloated. We would be better off if we eliminated all
subsidies.
Norb
Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader
No comments:
Post a Comment