Professor Thinks Banning These Words Would Fix Free
Speech on College Campuses by Kelsey Harkness, 11/21/18.
"Professors who hold unpopular positions or state inconvenient
facts are now considered psychologically toxic," says Amy Wax, a professor
at the University of Pennsylvania Law School. One of her fixes: No one on
campus should be allowed to accuse others of being racist, sexist, xenophobic,
white supremacist, or the like. (Photo courtesy of Amy Wax)
University of Pennsylvania law professor
Amy Wax is accustomed to political wrong-think.
Wax has a bachelor’s degree from Yale
College, a medical degree from Harvard, and a law degree from Columbia. But
none of those was enough to exempt her from being on the receiving end of a
full-fledged campaign to get her fired. Nor was arguing 15 cases before the
Supreme Court on behalf of the Justice Department, but that’s beside the point.
Wax doesn’t fear being called racist,
sexist, or xenophobic, probably because she’s been called many of those names
before. Instead of retreating to the safety of her tenure when things get
tough, she doubles down—demanding debate, evidence, and accountability.
Students and colleagues alike have
attacked Wax for making the apparently offensive case that traditional marriage
values lead to better results for children, and for putting forth the radical
argument that many of the country’s problems are a symptom of the breakdown of
the “bourgeois culture” (the 1940s and ’50s way of life).
In making that argument, Wax addressed the fact that things weren’t perfect back then, but
like clockwork, her critics called her “racist and classist” anyway.
The straw that really broke the camel’s
back, however, happened when student activists searching for dirt on Wax
unearthed a 2017 podcast interview she did with economist and Brown University
professor Glenn Loury.
In the interview, Wax said this when addressing
the issue of affirmative action: “I don’t think I’ve ever seen a black student
graduate in the top quarter of [my] class, and rarely, rarely, in the top half.
I can think of one or two students who scored in the first half of my required
first-year Civil Procedure course.”
Grades at the University of Pennsylvania
are name-blind (meaning the instructor covers up students’ names prior to
grading), so Wax says it’d be impossible to discriminate.
Critics jumped on her statement,
interpreting it to mean “Amy Wax said black students can’t excel in law
school.”
Eventually, the University of
Pennsylvania Law School relieved Wax of her teaching duties for first-year law
students.
In a Nov. 8 speech at The Heritage
Foundation, Wax talked about the fallout of her politically incorrect
statements in depth, and put forth tangible ideas about how to counter a
radical, identity-based grievance culture that’s now rampant in university
life.
First and foremost, Wax said, “Remind
students that one of the central missions of the university, which justifies
its existence, is to get at the truth.” She said:
That requires
honest debate, patience, intellectual honesty, investigation, and a lot of hard
work. But it also is not for the faint of heart. And that is a lesson that is
almost never transmitted today. That offense, bruising thoughts, and unpleasant
facts simply go with the territory. They are an intrinsic feature of an open
society, and they never can be entirely avoided.
Next, Wax argued for censorship of
speech—but not in the way you might think.
Here are her ideas, implemented as
guidelines in her seminars and upper-level classes, lightly edited for clarity:
No one can be
heard to say, ‘I’m offended.’ They all have permission to be offended. But they
just can’t express it.
No one is
allowed to accuse anyone else, in the classroom or out, dead or alive, of being
racist, sexist, xenophobic, white supremist, or any other derisive,
identity-based label. No slurs or name-calling. These don’t enlighten, educate,
or edify. They add nothing. Give us an argument. Tell us why the other person
is wrong.
No one can
complain to administrators—those officious thought police—about anything said
in class.
Finally, both
the government and private donors need to rethink the lavish financial support
for higher education, and especially for elite and selective institutions,
which serve only a teeny-tiny portion of our population and which in many ways,
I’m afraid, have become an anti-Western and anti-American liability.
How can we
get the rich to see that supporting elite universities today might not be the
wisest and more fruitful uses of their hard-earned money? What we need is a
list of alternative causes and alternative institutions and goals for their
money that help ordinary, average, un-special people who have been unduly
neglected by our elites and our increasingly walled off from them.
Wax expressed doubt that classrooms on
college campuses would adopt these guidelines anytime soon. “The question is
whether there’s any hope of such protocols being implemented on a wide scale.
In the current climate, I doubt it,” she said. Until then, she expects the
threat against politically incorrect professors will get worse.
“Professors who hold unpopular positions
or state inconvenient facts are now considered psychologically toxic,” Wax
said, adding:
If their
presence causes offense, distress, feelings of insult, fears of ill treatment,
that is enough to eject them from the classroom. And of course, these
perceptions and feelings are subjective, they are self-confirming, they are
immune from challenge. It’s all in the mind of the beholder. And the beholder’s
mind reigns supreme.
Hear more from Amy Wax in The Daily Signal’s
upcoming edition of “Problematic Women,” where we ask her about #MeToo,
feminism, and gender roles.
Kelsey
Harkness is a senior news producer at The Daily Signal and co-host of "Problematic Women," a podcast and
Facebook Live show. Send an email to
Kelsey.
Norb Leahy, Dunwoody
GA Tea Party Leader
No comments:
Post a Comment