The H1b used to require employers
to pay non-citizen new hires the same as US citizen hires. This prevented the
hiring of cheap foreign labor. It also
required employers to prove that non-citizen hires were necessary. We had to
prove that the non-citizen we wanted to hire had skills we needed that were not
available in our US citizen applicant pool.
I’ve filed H1b applications since
1967 to hire non-citizen engineers we selected from US campuses. They had
higher GPAs than the US citizen applicants. I’ve also seen US citizen
applicants with the same engineering degrees who couldn’t do math. I’ve always
used technical screening tests and technical interviews by engineers in the
selection process. English proficiency and communication abilities are also required.
The H1b has been diluted and
corrupted and should only be available to employers for regular full-time
hiring of BS and MS engineering grads, not temporary jobs, off-shored jobs or
entry level IT technicians . See article
below:
College Grads Launch Protest against
H-1B Middle-Class Outsourcing
An expanding group of American professionals is building support for a January 26 protest against the outsourcing of middle-class jobs via the H-1B visa program.
An expanding group of American professionals is building support for a January 26 protest against the outsourcing of middle-class jobs via the H-1B visa program.
The Protect U.S. Workers
group has scheduled the protest in Connecticut, where the state’s governor
is providing a subsidy to an Indian company which uses H-1B visa-workers
to outsource U.S. middle-class jobs back into low-wage India.
Nationwide, the H-1B
program keeps roughly 650,000 temporary foreign workers in a wide variety of
technology, medical, business, and education jobs. Roughly 70 percent of the
H-1B visa-workers are recruited in India, where many people will work at low
wages in the hope of getting a green card via the H-1B program. The H-1B
program is one of many visa plans which lowers salaries for a vast swath
of American college-grads by keeping roughly 1.5 million foreign graduates in
U.S.-based jobs.
The planned protest
against the H-1B visa comes as the Atlantic Council published a report slamming
the H-1B visa program because it “creates new market failures and exacerbates
existing ones.”
The report says the H-1B
program has never been fixed to meet the original [1990] promises made by
Congress of safeguarding US jobs. Instead, the program has been expanded
to allow even larger numbers of H-1B workers, admitting them for longer periods
of time, while its flawed governing rules have remained as they were in 1990.
The report is titled
“Reforming US’ High-Skilled Guestworker Program.” It was written by Ron Hira
and Bharath Gopalaswamy.
Dawn Casey and other
activists in the group are using radio ads to promote the Connecticut protest
against the H-1B program:
In
October, the group used billboards to help defeat Kansas GOP Rep. Kevin Yoder,
who was pushing legislation that would expand incentives for Indians to become
low-wage visa workers in the United States. Yoder’s “country caps” plan was
dropped by GOP leaders in December, despite lobbying by many
business groups — partly because of a sharp fall in GOP support among
suburban, college-educated voters.
The
group is also using Twitter to encourage turnout at the protest, amid fears
among American graduates that any protest will allow recruiters to blackball
them from professional jobs.
The immediate target of
the protest is the deal between Connecticut’s governor and an Indian company,
Infosys, which is hired by many U.S. companies to transfer well-paid work and
white-collar jobs to India.
A December 5,
2018, report by a
local TV station described the deal: It was Governor Elect Ned Lamont who
convinced the head of Infosys to come. “I went down on bended knee to New York
probably two or three times to his office,” said Lamont. “I told him about the
amazing state of Connecticut and one day he said ‘I’ll come up and take a
look.’”
But
it was Governor [Daniel] Malloy who incentivized him to stay. “We took the
heat of making the financial deal and he will get the benefit of the jobs,”
Gov. Malloy joked.
Infosys
could get $12 million in grant money for meeting the job benchmarks [of 1,000
or 2,000 in-state jobs]. The three floor, 65,000 square foot hub was a $20.6
million project.
Under
the deal, Infosys is obliged to create local jobs. But it not clear if any of
the local jobs will go to local Americans because Infosys typically hires
Indians, usually via the H-1B, L-1, and Optional Practical Training
work-permit programs.
Many
thousands of Americans’ jobs in Connecticut have been outsourced to India via
the multi-year visa programs, each of which lasts from three to seven years.
In 2017, the federal
government approved 2,439 new H-1B visas for companies for work in
Connecticut. The total included 163 visas for Infosys, which likely has a
population of 500 H1B in the state, according to government data presented
by MyVisaJobs.com.
H1BFacts.com counts
14,000 H-1Bs in the state. Many of the H-1Bs are lower skilled and are paid —
on paper — less than $90,000. Many reports show that
many H-1B workers are paid far less than what their companies promise when they
ask for the work visa.
The federal government
also allows foreign students and graduates to take U.S. jobs. For example, the
University of Connecticut sponsored 1,133 visa workers in 2017, according
to federal data. The
former students are allowed to work via the huge but
little-known “Optional Practical Training”
program. The University of Bridgeport sponsored 1,075 workers, and Yale
sponsored 961. Overall, in 2017, there were 17,000 foreign students
in the state who can work for in U.S. jobs, according to federal data.
In 2017, Infosys also won visas for at least 288 L-1 workers to
take jobs in the United States.
Hilarie Gamm is the
pseudonym for a software manager who has tracked outsourcing in
her home state of Connecticut. In a post for the U.S. Techworkers group, she wrote:
Hartford, the state’s
near-bankrupt capital, is a ghost of its former self. Never making the news is
the impact of foreign labor on white-collar Connecticut professionals.
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, more than 150,000 tech workers were
non-U.S. citizens working in Connecticut in 2016 …
At The Hartford
Insurance Company, for example, both technology employees and IBM contractors
were required to train their replacements from Tata Consultancy, the Mumbai,
India-based multinational IT service, and consulting company. Mass Mutual
Insurance in Enfield replaced its tech workforce with H-1B workers from
Cognizant, another multinational that provides IT services, and India offshore
labor.
Further, Connecticut
General Life Insurance, The Prudential in Hartford, Prudential Annuities in
Shelton, Aspen Insurance, Hartford Fire Insurance Company, The Travelers
Insurance and Chubb Insurance all have laid off Connecticut white-collar
professionals and replaced them with workers in the Philippines and India.
Financial services
companies, including UBS, Citibank, RBS, Citizen’s Bank, Voya and Bank Mobile,
have all laid off white-collar professionals, according to [Trade Adjustment
Assistance] filings.
They have been replaced with either offshore foreign employees or by a
combination of H-1B visa holders here in the U.S. and offshore foreign workers
provided by Cognizant, Tata and Infosys – another Indian multinational
services provider.
The New Haven Register
replaced their publication’s graphic designers with remote foreign workers.
Thomson Reuters, Nielsen, and Unilever have all displaced Connecticut tech
workers with foreign staff. Even Norwalk’s Pepperidge Farms and Milford’s Ann
Taylor outsourced their accounting departments to India.
One
victim of the national outsourcing trend was Donna B. She is now retired to a
small town in Arizona and earns so little money that she is not required
to pay off the $50,000 in student loans she owes from her software education in
1989.
Divorced
and with five children, “I was 36 years old when I started” in 1989, she told
Breitbart News. After her first job in Connecticut, she moved to Arizona by
1993, where she met her first Indian H-1B workers. “They did not mix with any
of us and could not speak English,” she said.
In
2002, “I had my first layoff and I could not find a job anywhere for
four years,” she said. She applied for a job in Boston to repeat the same work
she had done in Arizona, but “I could never get an interview, I was being
stalled and nothing happened.”
She
eventually landed a job at Caremark but was laid off in 2010 after the company
merged with CVS. “The next year they brought in Indians to do exactly what I
had been doing,” she said.
“I
never found a job after that … I applied for tons of jobs, tons … I never
got a response except ‘Thank you for applying.’” Many of the job
interviews were conducted with Indians from the outsourcing companies, each of which
has an economic incentive to fill jobs with cheap Indian H-1Bs, not Americans,
she said. “I’ve gotten calls and I’ve gotten emails from Indians [when
applying for jobs] … It just goes nowhere,” she said. “Last year I
retired, so my retirement is peanuts,” she said. “I live in a tiny town called Arizona City, which doesn’t
have mail service.”
The
Atlantic Council’s scathing report on the H-1B program offered four fixes to
the H-1B program:
The
first, and most important, reform is to substantially raise the wages of H-1B
workers. If the United States is going to invite in the “best and brightest”
workers, they ought to be paid in the top quartile. The statute requires there
to be four wage levels, but it doesn’t specify how the DOL calculates those wage
levels. The Labor Department should raise the Level 1 wage to the 75th
percentile, to ensure that the workers being recruited are indeed highly
skilled and are not undercutting US workers. This can be done through an
administrative procedure, either via policy guidance or a regulation.
Second,
employers should demonstrate they have actively recruited US workers, and
offered positions to qualified ones, prior to turning to the H-1B program. … A
recruitment requirement would also stamp out the preferential hiring practices
used by many mass H-1B employers.
Third, the program needs
an effective and efficient enforcement mechanism. Current program compliance is
complaint-driven, resting almost entirely on whistleblowers to reduce fraud …
US workers who blow the whistle risk being blackballed from the industry, and
there are no cases to date in which US workers have been successful … The
government can randomly select a small percentage of employers to audit each
year for program compliance. To ensure compliance by all employers, sufficient
punishments should be meted out, with significant consequences such as
debarment for willful violators.
In addition to these
three core reforms, there should be adjustments to the allocation process. It
makes no sense to allocate H-1B on a first-come, first-served basis or, even
worse, by random lottery—as occurs when the program is immediately
oversubscribed. Instead, as the Buy American Hire American EO suggests, visas
should be allocated to the best and brightest first.
Nationwide, the U.S.
establishment’s economic policy of using legal migration and visa workers to
boost economic growth shifts wealth from young people towards older people
by flooding the
market with cheap white-collar and blue-collar foreign labor. That flood
of outside labor spikes profits
and Wall Street values by cutting salaries for
manual and skilled labor of blue-collar and white-collar employees.
The cheap labor
policy widens wealth
gaps, reduces high
tech investment, increases state
and local tax burdens, hurts kids’
schools and college education, pushes Americans
away from high tech careers, and sidelines at least five million marginalized Americans
and their families, including many who are now struggling with
fentanyl addictions.
Immigration also steers
investment and wealth away from towns in
Heartland states because coastal investors can more easily hire and
supervise the large immigrant populations who prefer to live in
coastal cities. In turn, that investment flow drives up
coastal real estate prices, pricing poor U.S. Latinos and blacks out
of prosperous cities, such as Berkeley and Oakland.
Comments
State and local
corporate subsidies and tax holidays for “economic development” is corrupting
our immigration laws. Taxpayers are funding their own demise. States should not
be offering tax incentives to companies to outsource work to foreign countries
or hire foreign workers.
The H1b needs to be
limited to design engineers with a minimum of a BSEE, BSME US engineering
degree and a GPA higher than US citizen applicants.
The H2b needs to be
limited to Techs with a minimum of an Associates’ Degree in EE and ME.
Norb Leahy, Dunwoody
GA Tea Party Leader
No comments:
Post a Comment