Thursday, January 24, 2019

Hydroelectric Power in US


Hydroelectric is the low cost option for electric power generation at less than 1 cent/kwh. The average cost of hydro generation is 0.85 cents/kwh. Hydro creates reservoirs to increase the US clean water supply. Reservoirs are also used for recreation and boating and increase land values around the lakes.

The US got 7.5% of its electricity from hydroelectric power plants in 2017. The US produced 300 terawatts of electricity in 2017, up from 268 terawatts in 2004.

The largest hydro plants are listed in this article.

The largest electricity generating power plants in the US are listed in this article. It include nuclear, hydro, natural gas and coal powered systems.

In the U.S., hydropower is produced for an average of 0.85 cents per kilowatt-hour (kwh). This is about 50% the cost of nuclear, 40% the cost of fossil fuel, and 25% the cost of using natural gas.
Worldwide, about 20% of all electricity is generated by hydropower in 2016.
Hydropower provided about 10% of the electricity in the United States in 2016.

In the US, States and Power Companies need to keep developing hydroelectric dams and reservoirs to mitigate floods and increase the reserve water supply to survive droughts.

The cost of creating these reservoirs involves the purchase of hundreds of acres of land and the cost of clearing the land to be flooded. It includes grading, water diversion and constructing the dam. The cost to Power companies involves the construction of the hydropower facility with turbines and controls. 

Near Atlanta GA, the largest reservoirs are Lake Lanier at 37,000 acres and Lake Allatoona at 12,000 acres. Farmland in Georgia is $2000 per acre. At that price, the State would pay at least $24 million for 12,000 acres for a reservoir the size of Allatoona.

The State of Georgia should have invested $24 million to build a reservoir for a Hydro plant instead of wasting $24 million on a wildlife preserve.

Given the problems Georgia Power has had with its expansion of Nuclear Plant Vogel, they would have been better off developing Hydro and avoiding the gridlocked US government bureaucracy.

Georgia Power has no reason to invest in Wind and Solar given the high cost and intermittent production these methods produce. Wind, Solar and Thermal are good systems for a wealthy 10,000 acre ranch, not for poor urban and rural consumers.

Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader

No comments: