It
is unlikely the Supreme Court will rule on a federal ban on "sanctuary
status" in 2025 because the core issue of federal commandeering under
the Tenth Amendment is still being
litigated, and the Court has already limited its ability to issue nationwide
injunctions. Recent court rulings have blocked the administration's ability to
withhold federal funds and noted that compelling states to participate in federal
immigration enforcement likely violates the Tenth Amendment. A ruling on a
specific federal ban would depend on whether and how the issue reaches the
Supreme Court after lower courts have had a chance to rule.
Tenth Amendment challenges: Federal efforts to force local jurisdictions to cooperate with immigration enforcement have been challenged as unconstitutional under the Tenth Amendment, which prevents the federal government from compelling states and localities to enforce a federal regulatory program.
Blocking executive orders: Federal judges have already issued rulings, at least in specific districts, that have temporarily barred the current administration from withholding federal funds from "sanctuary jurisdictions".
Limited nationwide injunctions: A recent Supreme Court decision has limited the ability of federal judges to issue nationwide injunctions, making it less likely that a single ruling could stop a federal policy from taking effect across the entire country.
Future litigation: Any ruling on a federal ban would likely depend on the outcome of ongoing and future lawsuits. A ruling on the constitutional "commandeering" question is still pending, and it remains to be seen if and when a case will make its way to the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court is not expected to issue a direct, broad ruling on a federal ban on "sanctuary status" in late 2025, as no such case has been argued before the court this term. However, the Court has issued some recent rulings (in September 2025) and has taken up other immigration-related cases for the current term that may indirectly affect sanctuary policies.
Key developments in 2025 include:
Ongoing Legal Battles: President Trump's April 2025 executive order to withhold federal funds from sanctuary jurisdictions has triggered a new round of lawsuits. Lower federal courts are currently handling these cases, which will need to work their way through the appeals process before potentially reaching the Supreme Court.
The Tenth Amendment: Existing Supreme Court precedent, based on the Tenth Amendment's "anti-commandeering" doctrine, generally prohibits the federal government from forcing state and local governments to enforce federal law. This doctrine is a key argument used by sanctuary jurisdictions in current lawsuits.
Recent Related Rulings: In September 2025, the Supreme Court issued a stay in the case Noem v. Vasquez Perdomo, allowing federal immigration agents to continue arrests based on "reasonable suspicion" in the Los Angeles area, lifting a lower court's injunction. While not a direct ruling on the constitutionality of sanctuary policies, this decision affects the ability of federal agents to conduct immigration enforcement operations within communities.
Pending Cases: The Court has agreed to hear Noem v. Al Otro Lado in the current term, which focuses on whether asylum seekers who have not physically crossed into the U.S. have "arrived" in the country for processing purposes, with arguments scheduled for early 2026.
Ultimately, the power to ban sanctuary status nationwide faces significant constitutional challenges rooted in federalism and states' rights. Any definitive Supreme Court ruling on the legality of a federal ban on sanctuary status is unlikely to occur in 2025 given the current court calendar and litigation timelines.
Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader
No comments:
Post a Comment