Open Borders Legislation in the States

Institutionalized Corruption in the Spotlight

Posted on April 5, 2015 Written by Vicky Davis, channelingreality.com

By now, most peo­ple are aware that our gov­ern­ments – fed­eral, state and local – are out of control. What is not so obvi­ous is that gov­ern­ments are out of con­trol because they are uncon­trol­lable due to the insti­tu­tional struc­tures that have been imple­mented over the last cen­tury. The mis­sion and pur­pose of gov­ern­ment has been lost in the devel­op­ment of insti­tu­tion­al­ized pro­fes­sional asso­ci­a­tions and prac­tices that exist to serve those pro­fes­sions and not the inter­ests of the Peo­ple they pur­port to serve.

The con­flicts of inter­est between the peo­ple as the pub­lic body and the gov­ern­ment as a struc­ture along ­with the pro­fes­sion­als engaged to serve a pub­lic pur­pose can­not be seen by exam­i­na­tion of the pub­lished orga­ni­za­tion chart of the respec­tive gov­ern­ments. Nor can they be found in the foun­da­tional doc­u­ments that autho­rized the cre­ation of those gov­ern­ments. The rea­son is because the process of gov­ern­ing has been moved out­side of gov­ern­ment with author­ity passed on to pri­va­tized, inde­pen­dent bod­ies that are unac­count­able and for the most part invis­i­ble to the public.

This morn­ing in my email, there was an urgent mes­sage con­cern­ing a piece of leg­is­la­tion that prob­a­bly will be voted on Mon­day. Below, I’m just giv­ing the Bill Num­ber and the clauses that brought me to a full stop:

Sen­ate Bill 1067 sub­mit­ted by the Judi­ciary and Rules Com­mit­tee AN ACT RELATING TO THE UNIFORM  INTERSTATE FAMILY SUPPORT ACT; AMENDING … AMENDING CHAPTER 10, TITLE 7, IDAHO CODE, BY THE ADDITION OF A NEW SECTION 7 — 1004A, IDAHO CODE, TO PROVIDE FOR THE APPLICATION OF THE CHAPTER TO RESIDENT OF FOREIGN COUNTRY AND FOREIGN SUPPORT PROCEEDINGS;

In the text of leg­is­la­tion, it says this:
(2) “Child — sup­port order” means a sup­port order for a child, includ­ing a child who has attained the age of major­ity under the law of the issu­ing state or for­eign coun­try.
(3) “Con­ven­tion” means the Con­ven­tion on the Inter­na­tional Recov­ery of Child Sup­port and Other Forms of Fam­ily Main­te­nance, con­cluded at The Hague on Novem­ber 23, 2007.

And that’s only to page 3. I didn’t fin­ish read­ing the rest because the long and short of it is that the Idaho Leg­is­la­ture is about to vote to rec­og­nize inter­na­tional law in Idaho law. That is mon­u­men­tal. This is proof pos­i­tive that the leg­is­la­tors know and are com­plicit with the glob­al­ist agenda for a one-world sys­tem of “gov­er­nance” under inter­na­tional law. And these same leg­is­la­tors are about to vote on whether to call a Con­sti­tu­tional Con­ven­tion – sup­pos­edly to write an amend­ment to require a bal­anced bud­get. Sure.…I believe that don’t you?

A book could be writ­ten about the impli­ca­tions of recog­ni­tion of inter­na­tional law in Idaho law, but to keep it sim­ple in terms that most peo­ple under­stand, it will mean that Idaho will have to fund a sec­tion in the Attor­ney General’s office to han­dle inter­na­tional cases and Idaho courts will have to have inter­na­tional law experts on staff or on retainer.

When one con­sid­ers cost vs ben­e­fit, the costs will far out­weigh any ben­e­fit to Idaho tax­pay­ers and in fact, it out­weighs the costs to U.S. tax­pay­ers as well. I was told that the per­son who sub­mit­ted it to the Judi­ciary Com­mit­tee was Kandee Years­ley, Child Sup­port Bureau Chief for the Health and Wel­fare Depart­ment so I called her. I told her that I knew it was model leg­is­la­tion and I wanted to know who wrote it. She said the Uni­form Law Com­mis­sion wrote it for Health & Human Ser­vices / Admin­is­tra­tion for Chil­dren & Fam­i­lies  (HHS/ACF) and the ACF gave it to her and she gave it to the Judi­ciary Committee.

An obvi­ous ques­tion is why would HHS/ACF be push­ing this leg­is­la­tion on the states? Easy answer. ACF is the divi­sion of HHS that super­vises the Refugees pro­gram and all of those unac­com­pa­nied minors have par­ents some­where that need to sup­port their chil­dren. It’s a dou­ble gotcha sucka. Gotcha hav­ing to take them in – pro­vid­ing every­thing includ­ing pay­ments to fos­ter par­ents, med­ical care, den­tal care, social ser­vices costs asso­ci­ated with “at risk” chil­dren in the schools and now the gotcha when we have to pay for lawyers to track down their par­ents to bring them to court in the for­eign coun­try they are in – and then enforc­ing the inter­na­tional decrees in Idaho courts.

Since I didn’t recall ever vot­ing for any­body to write uni­form laws for Idaho, I went hunt­ing for the Uni­form Law Com­mis­sion. I found them. 111 N. Wabash Avenue, Suite 1010, Chicago, IL 60602. The fol­low­ing is from the Uni­form Law Com­mis­sion nar­ra­tive: The Uni­form Law Com­mis­sion (ULC, also known as the National Con­fer­ence of Com­mis­sion­ers on Uni­form State Laws), estab­lished in 1892, pro­vides states with non-partisan, well-conceived and well-drafted leg­is­la­tion that brings clar­ity and sta­bil­ity to crit­i­cal areas of state statu­tory law.

ULC mem­bers must be lawyers, qual­i­fied to prac­tice law. They are prac­tic­ing lawyers, judges, leg­is­la­tors and leg­isla­tive staff and law pro­fes­sors, who have been appointed by state gov­ern­ments as well as the Dis­trict of Colum­bia, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Vir­gin Islands to research, draft and pro­mote enact­ment of uni­form state laws in areas of state law where uni­for­mity is desir­able and prac­ti­cal. The Idaho mem­ber of the ULC who is also in the leg­is­la­ture is Bart Davis, Idaho Falls Dis­trict 33, Sen­ate Major­ity leader. He is on the Judi­ciary and Rules Com­mit­tee and the State Affairs Com­mit­tee. No excuses on this leg­is­la­tion. S 1067 went through his com­mit­tee. He is a lawyer and a mem­ber of the ULC.

In a news sec­tion of the web­site, it had this paragraph: The Uni­form Recog­ni­tion of Sub­sti­tute Decision-Making Doc­u­ments Act is a joint endeavor of the Uni­form Law Com­mis­sion and the Uni­form Law Con­fer­ence of Canada.

The project was under­taken to pro­mote the porta­bil­ity and use­ful­ness of sub­sti­tute decision-making doc­u­ments for prop­erty, health care, and per­sonal care, with­out regard to whether the doc­u­ments are cre­ated within or out­side of the juris­dic­tion where a sub­sti­tute deci­sion is needed. Com­mon exam­ples of sub­sti­tute decision-making doc­u­ments include pow­ers of attor­ney and proxy del­e­ga­tions for per­sonal deci­sion mak­ing. You’ve got to love that – inter­na­tional doc­u­ment sub­sti­tu­tion which is uni­form per­pe­tra­tion of a fraud. Only a lawyer would be ballsy enough to put that in print.

And the best for last – this tid­bit was found by a fel­low researcher on the HHS/ACF web­site just before pub­li­ca­tion of this article:

ACTION TRANSMITTAL AT — 14–11 DATE: Octo­ber 9, 2014 TO: State Agen­cies Admin­is­ter­ing Child Sup­port Plans under Title IV-D of the Social Secu­rity Act and Other Inter­ested Individuals

On Sep­tem­ber 29, 2014 Pres­i­dent Obama signed Pub­lic Law (P.L.) 113–183, the Pre­vent­ing Sex Traf­fick­ing and Strength­en­ing Fam­i­lies Act. This law amends sec­tion 466(f) of the Social Secu­rity Act, requir­ing all states to enact any amend­ments to the Uni­form Inter­state Fam­ily Sup­port Act “offi­cially adopted as of Sep­tem­ber 30, 2008 by the National Con­fer­ence of Com­mis­sion­ers on Uni­form State Laws” (referred to as UIFSA 2008).

Among other changes , the UIFSA 2008 amend­ments inte­grate the appro­pri­ate pro­vi­sions of The Hague Con­ven­tion on the Inter­na­tional Recov­ery of Child Sup­port and Other Forms of Fam­ily Main­te­nance, which was adopted at the Hague Con­fer­ence on Pri­vate Inter­na­tional Law on Novem­ber 23, 2007, referred to as the 2007 Fam­ily Main­te­nance Convention.

It seems to this writer that what we have here is a case of uni­form sedi­tion and malfea­sance . The vot­ers of Idaho did not elect the Uni­form Law Com­mis­sion to write laws for us – and we sure as hell did not vote for leg­is­la­tors to act as agents for an inter­na­tional sys­tem of “gov­er­nance” that under­mines the sov­er­eignty of the State of Idaho, the cit­i­zens of Idaho and the sov­er­eignty of the United States as a whole.

These lawyers engaged in pub­lic law writ­ing have turned the world inside — out and upside — down. Our gov­ern­ment no longer works for the Amer­i­can peo­ple – and that includes the Idaho state gov­ern­ment as well as the fed­eral gov­ern­ment. It seems to be work­ing only for non-Americans in a bizarre and twisted sys­tem of reverse col­o­niza­tion in which the gov­ern­ment is facil­i­tat­ing a for­eign occu­pa­tion and takeover of our country.

There is no option. It must stop or we will become the unwel­come squat­ters in our own country.

Related Posts

• Agenda 21: The Plan for a Global Fas­cist Dictatorship
• Civ­i­liza­tion Rights
  Filed Under: Agenda 21, New World Order, United Nations
   
  http://agenda21news.com/2015/04/institutionalized-corruption-in-the-spotlight/
  Comments
  Most states have UN Agenda 21 enabling laws supporting Regionalism, Land Use Plans, property rights violations and UN program supports.
  Only 20% of our elected officials are Constitutionalists.  They have high scores on the Club for Growth, New American, Conservative Review, Numbers USA and Heritage websites. The other 80% cannot be trusted to consider how Bills violate the US Constitution (as written). International Marxist Globalists unduly influence elections by infiltrating business, the US Chamber of Commerce and the media.  Campaign contributions are the reason why our political system is corrupt.
  Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader