What Can the Righteous Do? Hank
Sullivan, 1/4/19.
Now I propose as my thesis today that politics may be the perfect earthly laboratory for the human spirit to receive a deeper understanding of Scripture. The question whether to crucify Jesus, for example, was one answered democratically. Pontius Pilot refused to make that critical judgment on his own authority. Pilot required the people judge the fate of Jesus.
But if the psalmist is correct, and for our purposes let’s just assume he is, then we can conclude that while it is practically unavoidable that mankind, in the countless alliances the earth divides geographically, must somehow base its various political systems, designing those systems however it might, it is instructive to recognize that in 1776 the American founders chose one enduring precept, directly from Scripture, as the foundation for their new nation. And that would be the precept of truth, which is self-evident.
Recalling again the words of the psalmist, if one were to attempt to destroy the American design of our founders, one must somehow destroy truth. Without its imparted foundation of truth, America dies. Without truth as cement, America’s foundation crumbles.
Now the fastest way to destroy truth is subtly redefining it. Rather than absolute, you make truth relative to the observer. That way, all truth is created equal. My truth is always valid, and yours, which conflicts with mine, is also just as valid. Because all truth registers the same, societal decisions can be controlled by manipulating public perceptions of truth, thus altering opinions, coalescing similar opinions into groups, and organizing like-minded groups into voting constituencies. Because no truth is better than any other, even those on the fringes, for example those born one gender but insist they are another, express truth just as valid as those for whom traditional gender definitions described in the Bible, are fundamental.
Once one has made truth relative to the observer, one would do the same with the America’s constitutional definitions. The result would be a “living and breathing” Constitution, the definitions of which would be molded into any meanings political advantage might require. Along with a wholly redefined, relativistic Constitution arrives a plethora of possible destructive governmental policies, perhaps even eradicating national boundaries.
And finally, one would saturate the population with fake news, even legalizing the use of government propaganda against the American people. The result would be overwhelming societal confusion, societal breakdown, the last, best hope of earth, America, destroyed. And so the question I will leave you to consider today is, indeed, what can the righteous do?
I do not believe one can adequately understand the Bible simply by
reading it. Now reading is a fine start. But until one casts the
face value of biblical expressions into the physical world, and deeply
considers all that bounces back, frankly, pondering the Bible is largely an
academic undertaking. Don’t get me wrong. Yes, read the
Bible. Read it to your kids. Go to church and take them with
you.
Provide children an academic foundation for expanding their
understanding later on. But just expect that any higher meaning the Bible
offers will only arise from a spiritual understanding, founded in one’s unique
life experiences and relationship with God, not a mental one based solely on
academic study. And most kids and many adults are not ready to understand
deep, spiritual wisdom, just saying.
And to receive spiritual wisdom, of course one must engage the
spirit. But doing so while earning a living among life’s distractions may
be easier said than done. Enter suffering. Suffering adversity
during man’s temporal, physical existence finds its higher purpose in offering
a reason to look deeper, and to contemplate a more profound meaning in life,
beyond what life may seem otherwise. And the longer one is blessed to wander
the spatial environment we each inherit, the more opportunity one receives to
contemplate the true meaning of life and spiritual matters beyond our given
four dimensions. Thus, with age comes wisdom.
Perhaps there is a lesson in that, that democracy, essentially
rule by popular opinion, may not be all that some crack it up to be.
Democracy, once termed “popular sovereignty” by the esteemed Illinois Senator
Stephen Douglass, was the fundamental issue disputed during the Lincoln-Douglas
debates of the 1850’s. Douglas held that the question whether one man
might justifiably enslave another was one that should be decided
democratically. Only the people, in the aggregate, would be able to make
such a wise, societal decision. Perhaps we should beware those who
describe the American form of government as “democracy.” Our founders
knew much better than to authorize our republic to follow unbridled public
opinion. After all, the Bible informs us man has a few faults to reconcile,
doesn’t he?
The Apostle John made it clear, that to worship God, one must
engage the spirit and speak truth. Perhaps truth is the only language the
spirit can understand. Consider then that our founding fathers designed
the American political system as one that is spiritual in nature, and when
operated in accordance with its founding precept, vicariously worships God, an
activity righteous and pleasing in God’s sight.
Norb Leahy, Dunwoody
GA Tea Party Leader
No comments:
Post a Comment