In 2009, the Dunwoody City Council voted to contract the
writing of Ordinances and Codes to a consulting firm. These documents were full of problems
designed to infringe on homeowners’ property rights.
The plans were full of open space, adopt a spot, complete
streets, Master Plans for strip malls and land use, walking paths, bike trails
and stream buffers going through private property, on-street bike lanes and
ordinances, permits, fees and fines that were not in existence before 2009 that
usurped the rights homeowners had in 2008.
The city attempted to put public space in the electric
distribution tower easement and homeowners refused, so they removed it from the
Parks Plan. Citizens were invited to
attend “visioning” meetings that used the Delphi technique to guide the
outcomes. The city placed a $66 million
Parks Bond issue on the ballot in 2011; It would have created a $128 million
debt and was defeated with a 66% NO vote.
Everything the consultants put in the plans was consistent
with what all other city councils were doing and it looked like UN Agenda 21
implementation. And it was. Consultants are trained by ICLEI, a UN non-profit
charged with UN Agenda 21 implementation. Federal grants to states include
printed and borrowed dollars as bribes to states to promote mal-investment.
Prior to implementing the Land Use and Zoning Codes, the
City again contracted with a consultant to do a final re-write of the plans and
they also had problems that were identified through the hearing processes, but
not fixed. The City Council then voted
to implement them. Over the past several
years, these plans created controversy and problems for homeowners, who had to
pass the hat and hire attorneys to present their case.
Now the city is looking at the plans again. The Community Council was assigned to review
Ch.16 and Ch.27 on November 13, 2014. Not enough time was given to the review
of the Land Use Plan Ch. 16 and the Zoning Plan Ch. 27 of the Dunwoody Code. Consultants
wrote the original plans and another consultant revised it and city staff
discussed it and proposed changes. The advisory committees were rushed through
their review and most of their objections were not considered. These passed the city council.
Problems with grant bribes arose in 2012 with a city
initiative to build a roundabout in a residential neighborhood, a 12 foot wide
concrete multi-use path around Brook Run Park and a $2.5 million redo of a ½
mile street in the middle of a strip mall.
Citizens with rotting streets objected and managed to get the roundabout
stopped, but the other two projects were built. Now the path is planned to go
to the MARTA station. On-street bike lanes were added in 2012, reducing the
driving lanes to 10 feet. Again citizens
objected and were ignored.
Problems in Ch. 16 began immediately with stream buffers
and in Ch. 27 with the split lot problem in Dunwoody Club Forest and the
Medical Treatment Center in Manget Way. Homeowners were forced to pay the cost
of objecting to these infringements to their residential neighborhoods. These issues
are being resolved in the courts.
Currently, there is a split lot issue on Leisure Court. We
need a 30 day notice to neighbors for infill permits that includes that the
builder and the city interact with the neighbors.
The second rewrite is again in the process of being
rushed through the advisory committees.
A split lot solution has not been determined. The home care facility category in R-100
should be removed.
Our Codes in Dunwoody are exposing homeowners to problems
we did not experience before the city was established. We should revisit the
DeKalb codes that existed prior to 2009 and adopt those. County records of property descriptions are
being found that are not complete or correct.
Our Codes are being passed like Obamacare. The City
Council passes it, so we can find out what’s in it. Our Codes are a moving target, so predatory
builders and developers are coming out of the woodwork. Building Permits are
being approved by staff without public notice or input.
Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader
No comments:
Post a Comment