Tuesday, November 4, 2014

Global Warming..Nope


NOAA Report Destroys Global Warming Link to Extreme Weather
Posted on November 3, 2014 Written by forbes.com
Sci­en­tists at the National Oceanic and Atmos­pheric Admin­is­tra­tion have demol­ished claims by global warm­ing activists that global warm­ing caused or wors­ened many extreme weather events last year.
Accord­ing to NOAA’s new pub­li­ca­tion, Explain­ing Extremes of 2013 from a Cli­mate Per­spec­tive, there is no dis­cernible con­nec­tion between global warm­ing and 2013 extreme weather events such as the Cal­i­for­nia drought, Col­orado floods, the UK’s excep­tion­ally cold spring, a South Dakota bliz­zard, Cen­tral Europe floods, a north­west­ern Europe cyclone, and excep­tional snow­fall in Europe’s Pyre­nees Mountains.
The Cal­i­for­nia drought pro­vides a good exam­ple of global warm­ing activists mak­ing false and irre­spon­si­ble claims regard­ing global warm­ing to delib­er­ately mis­lead peo­ple who aren’t famil­iar with sci­en­tific stud­ies and evi­dence. The lib­eral Cen­ter for Amer­i­can Progress and its media allies such as the Wash­ing­ton Post, San Jose Mer­cury News, Asso­ci­ated Press, and oth­ers have all pub­lished sto­ries claim­ing global warm­ing caused or wors­ened the ongo­ing Cal­i­for­nia drought. Sci­en­tists, how­ever, say just the oppo­site. “[F]or the Cal­i­for­nia drought, which was inves­ti­gated by three teams from the United States, human fac­tors were found not to have influ­enced the lack of rain­fall,” NOAA reported in an accom­pa­ny­ing press release.
Adding addi­tional empha­sis to the NOAA publication’s find­ings, sci­en­tists reported in the peer-reviewed Pro­ceed­ings of the National Acad­emy of Sci­ences that nat­ural fac­tors such as ocean cur­rent cycles and vary­ing wind pat­terns caused most of the warm­ing along the U.S. West Coast since 1900.
So, sci­en­tists report that most of the warm­ing in Cal­i­for­nia is nat­ural, and the evi­dence shows no link between global warm­ing and the Cal­i­for­nia drought. Nev­er­the­less, agenda-driven activist groups and their media lap­dogs repeat­edly tell the lie that global warm­ing is caus­ing California’s drought. Iron­i­cally – or not – Pres­i­dent Barack Obama and Sec­re­tary of State John Kerry fre­quently claim global warm­ing is respon­si­ble for the Cal­i­for­nia drought, all the while claim­ing peo­ple who dis­agree with them are mem­bers of the Flat Earth Soci­ety. Some­body tell that to the fed­eral government’s own sci­en­tists at NOAA.
Sim­i­larly, global warm­ing alarmists fre­quently claim global warm­ing causes extreme cold tem­per­a­tures and extreme snow­storms. Ana­lyz­ing two of these claims, NOAA found no evi­dence link­ing the events to global warm­ing. To the con­trary, NOAA reported “Analy­sis of UK cold spring showed the prob­a­bil­ity of occur­rence may have fallen 30-fold due to global warm­ing.” So, global warm­ing not only played no role in the UK’s cold 2013 spring, but global warm­ing made the dis­rup­tive event 30 times less likely than would oth­er­wise be the case. Nev­er­the­less, shame­less alarmists such as National Geo­graphic News claimed global warm­ing was respon­si­ble for the extremely cold spring. Despite the NOAA find­ings, National Geo­graphic News has yet to issue a retraction.
The dis­par­ity between sci­ence on the one hand and global warm­ing activists and alarmist media cov­er­age on the other hand is par­tic­u­larly strik­ing regard­ing the Col­orado floods of Sep­tem­ber 2013. Global warm­ing activists and their media allies wasted absolutely no time exploit­ing the vic­tims of the deadly floods to make irre­spon­si­ble claims that global warm­ing was to blame. NOAA sci­en­tists, how­ever, report global warm­ing played no role and may be mak­ing such tragic events less likely. Mod­el­ing of past and present Col­orado rain­fall events “found that the prob­a­bil­ity of another extreme 5-day rain­fall, like the one that caused wide­spread flood­ing in Boul­der, is esti­mated to have decreased because of human-caused cli­mate change,” NOAA reported.
Accord­ing to NOAA, heat waves were nev­er­the­less exac­er­bated by global warm­ing. Of course, any ampli­fi­ca­tion in heat waves is coun­ter­bal­anced by extreme cold events becom­ing 30 times less likely. Impor­tantly, global warming’s reduc­tion of extreme cold events pro­vides more human health and wel­fare ben­e­fits than any harm caused by an increase in heat waves. Offi­cial gov­ern­ment mor­tal­ity sta­tis­tics show peo­ple are much more likely to die dur­ing win­ter months and extreme cold events than dur­ing sum­mer months and heat waves.
The next time you hear politi­cians and global warm­ing activists claim global warm­ing is caus­ing or wors­en­ing extreme weather events, know that the objec­tive sci­ence shows they are telling self-serving lies.
Related Posts

No comments: