Saturday, November 8, 2014

Good Rural City & County Government

In many ways, it is easier for rural counties to elect descent county and city officers.  It’s easier to avoid electing a bad politician when everybody knows everybody.  Agriculture dominates most rural counties and this requires freedom to function. Farmers have been susceptible to government bribes and favors because their access to state government is enhanced. They have more state senators and house reps.
When manufacturing was plentiful in rural counties, life was much easier. The need for a farmer to have a good job in town was fulfilled.  This is no longer the case.
Agenda 21 implementation has been thwarted in rural counties due to the dynamics of their politics and their wisdom. They have much to lose with Agenda 21.  The Agenda 21 map has no rural counties or occupants, except wildlife.  They know their property is at risk.  And they love their land.
I lived in Salina Kansas from 1975 to 1983. Salina is a city in the middle of Kansas at the intersection of I-70 and I-35. Salina started as a “market town” for the wheat farmers and had the usual agricultural support businesses like banks, grain companies, auto, truck and farm implement dealers.
During World War II, Kansas became a popular state for military activities. Missile silos in Wichita followed.
In 1943, Salina what chosen as the site of what would become Shilling AFB that closed in 1949. It was reopened in 1951 as a SAC base for B-52s. It finally closed in 1965, but the wake-up call experienced by its closing in 1949 prepared the town fathers to act with a plan in 1965.  They got Shilling AFB to lease space for manufacturing companies on the base and open an Airport Authority to run the airport.
When I arrived in 1975, Salina had 45 manufacturing companies. Some on the base and others nearby. The population was about 40,000. We had 2 colleges and a Tech School. We had a community theater, 2 country clubs and 3 reservoirs nearby. I started a group for the companies to do wage surveys and have monthly meetings. The Chamber of Commerce had the merchants and took their cues from the town leaders.
Politics in Salina was honest, clean and serious. It was the county seat. The town fathers who ensured its future were still there and their heirs were becoming the town leaders. Roots make a difference.  They took turns running for Salina Mayor and Council and Saline County Commission.
Those of us who were running the manufacturing companies were invited and encouraged to be active. That’s how I got to know them. 
We were in a meeting one evening and the Mayor asked if we should consider building an amphitheater for concerts and events, but she was hesitant because she didn’t know if it would be a success. These were very conservative folks who viewed government as a service monopoly and were hesitant to go beyond the basics unless it was self-supporting and sustainable.  I asked if she would like to know what our manufacturing employees thought of that idea.  She gave me an emphatic Yes.  I had the other companies poll their employees and we got a unanimous Yes, with lots of suggestions and requests for specific guests.
We had an honest, dedicated, rooted leadership and lots of good smart folks running our 45 manufacturing companies with no conflicts of interest.  We were blessed.  But that is still a model that can be used in other rural towns and counties.
Before I left Salina, I was called on to install a Personnel system in Saline County. I got to meet the county department managers and key employees. I wrote their job descriptions, process mapped their functions and developed a wage survey they could use to survey other counties. Like the town fathers, these folks were first class. 
My image of good rural county politics is where honest, smart, tight-fisted old farmers, with no conflicts of interest prod each other to take turns running for and serving in public office. They should be financially well off with enough help to run the farm. They would ensure that the county is not overcharged for projects and that these projects were done properly. They would take the lowest bidder, but insist on a performance bond to insure their work. They would question every expenditure and ensure that they had an honest, hard-working county workforce.
Norb Leahy, Dunwoody GA Tea Party Leader
 

No comments: