Batteries
cannot make renewables reliable, by David Wojick
4/26/19, CFACT.
Utilities are starting to experiment
with adding batteries to wind and solar projects. These storage projects are
feeding the mistaken belief that batteries can cure the intermittency that
makes wind and solar unworkable as a reliable source of power.
The reality is that these battery
projects are trivial in size compared to what would actually be needed to make
wind or solar reliable. The cost of battery based reliability would actually be
stupendous, far more than we could ever afford.
Here are some simple numbers to make the
point. The reality would be far more complex, but the magnitude would not change
much.
First comes the cost of utility scale
battery facilities. This is much more than just the cost of the batteries. At
utility scale these are large, complex facilities. Connecting all of the
batteries involved and getting them to work properly together is a big
challenge in itself. AC-DC-AC conversions are also a big deal, plus there are
buildings, transmission stuff, etc.
In many cases these costs are
proprietary, but the U.S. Energy Information Administration has surveyed a
number of these facilities. See their “U.S. Battery Storage Market Trends,”
May 2018.
The reported costs are pretty wide
ranging, but the average is close to $1,500 per KWh, so let’s use that round
number.
Note that this is the cost per KWh of
storage capacity, not the KWh cost of energy from the batteries taken over
time, which is a very different matter. There is a lot of confusion on this
point. The KWh cost of juice goes down as the batteries are cycled more often,
but the cost of the battery facilities themselves does not change. In fact the
cost may go up because batteries that can be cycled faster cost more.
At utility scale we are talking about
megawatts, not kilowatts, so the battery cost is $1.5 million per MWh. By
coincidence, $1.5 million per MW is also roughly the cost of a wind farm. Much
follows from this.
A smallish wind farm might have
generating capacity of 100 MW, so costing around $150 million. The cost of the
batteries to make this farm a reliable power generator turns out to be much,
much greater.
Suppose we want to store enough juice to
back up the wind farm for just one day, when the wind speed is too low to
generate any power. Let’s say we simply need 100 MW for 24 hours, or 2,400 MWh.
At $1.5 million per MWh that is a
whopping $3,600 million or $3.6 billion. In short, the batteries cost 24 times
more than the “backed up” wind farm costs. In fact in this case the battery
cost will be the number of hours times the wind farm cost.
This huge cost certainly makes the wind
farm unaffordable, but it gets much worse. Under standard conditions a wind
farm produces no power around 25% of the time, due to low wind conditions. Low
wind periods of up to a week are fairly common, created by stagnant huge high
pressure systems. The power battery system has to be big enough to accommodate
these long periods of no wind power.
A week has 168 hours so we need 16,800
MWh of battery storage capacity, at the enormous cost of $25.2 billion, just to
make a $150 million wind farm reliable. This would obviously be absurd, which
makes the whole idea of battery backup absurd. Even if the cost of batteries
were to come way down, say by 90%, the cost would still be wildly prohibitive.
The battery systems that are being announced by major utilities are nothing
like real backup. They seldom store even an hour’s worth of generated power (at
great price). But they are often touted as being a big step toward making
renewables reliable. This is either deep ignorance or pure deception.
Batteries simply cannot make renewables
reliable. They cost too much.
Norb Leahy, Dunwoody
GA Tea Party Leader
No comments:
Post a Comment