TRUMP’S
PROMISE TO TOTALLY DESTROY THE ‘JOHNSON AMENDMENT’ IS A GOOD ONE, Ralph
J. Benko, 3/28/17
President Trump, at the
National Prayer Breakfast, attracted some media coverage with his declaration
that he would fulfill his campaign promise to “totally destroy” the Johnson Amendment. That is a
provision of the tax code prohibiting religious bodies and nonprofits from
engaging in politics. This law had been pushed through by then U.S. Senator,
later president, Lyndon Baines Johnson as, according to the New
York Times, a political bludgeon against a rival candidate. Trump
sounded a clear trumpet.
Left-leaning commentators expressed trepidation. Not so fast! One if by Land, Two if by Sea! These
words were coined by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow in his poem immortalizing the
“midnight ride” of Paul Revere. Revere rode to warn the Americans of the
British troops headed to what would enter history as the first military action
in the War of Independence, the “Battle of Lexington and Concord.” As it happens, the
signal lanterns were raised in the steeple of Boston’s Old North Church. One
could therefore well and truly say that America was born in a confluence of
Church and State.
The
populist conservative movement may be preparing to rally behind President Trump
in a new way. Welcome the arrival of the Spiritual Justice Warriors, an
initiative being spearheaded, in part, by the Trump Revolution USA. One of its leading online community organizers, William R
Collier, Jr. (one of my right-leaning colleagues), there writes: Our President and his team are under full on
assault. I don’t mean the Obama shadow government people, the media, the Never
Trumper, and all that. The assault comes from Hell itself. It manifests in the
hearts and mouths of foolish men and women who know not what they do. They rally with violence. We will rally… with prayer.
Prayer
indeed can be a powerful form of political action. In his speech to the
National Prayer Breakfast in Washington on February 2, President Trump declared: I want to thank
the American people. Your faith and prayers have sustained me and
inspired me through some very, very tough times. All around America, I
have met amazing people whose words of worship and encouragement have been a
constant source of strength. What I hear most often as I travel the
country are five words that never, ever fail to touch my heart. That’s: “I
am praying for you.” I hear it so often — “I am praying for you, Mr.
President.”
It was the great Thomas Jefferson who said, “The
God who gave us life, gave us liberty.” Jefferson asked, “Can the
liberties of a nation be secure when we have removed a conviction that these
liberties are the gift of God?” Among those freedoms is the right to worship
according to our own beliefs. That is why I will get rid of, and totally
destroy, the Johnson Amendment and allow our representatives of faith to speak
freely and without fear of retribution. I will do that — remember.
The
day after the speech The New York Times helpfully explained the Johnson Amendment: It is one of the brightest lines in the legal separation between
religion and politics.
Under the provision, which was made in 1954,
tax-exempt entities like churches and charitable organizations are unable to
directly or indirectly participate in any political campaign on behalf of, or
in opposition to, any candidate. Specifically, ministers are restricted from
endorsing or opposing candidates from the pulpit. If they do, they risk losing
their tax-exempt status.
Considered
uncontroversial at the time, it was passed by a Republican Congress and signed into law by
President Dwight D. Eisenhower, a Republican. Today, however, many Republicans
want to repeal it. …
Back when Lyndon B. Johnson was a senator from
Texas, he introduced the measure as an amendment to the tax code in 1954. Like
many things Johnson did, the goal was to bludgeon a political opponent, in this
case a rival in a primary who had the backing of nonprofit groups that were
campaigning against him by suggesting he was a communist. Though there was no
church involved, according
to PolitiFact,
churches were covered by the bill as well.”
Yes,
you read that right, “Like many things Johnson did, the goal was to bludgeon a
political opponent.” This amendment to the tax code also bludgeoned one of our
most essential — it comes before freedom of speech and the press —
Constitutional rights: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment
of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof….”
I am
a retired lawyer and know the Constitution very well. The First Amendment was enacted, in part, to prohibit Congress (later
extended to the States) from bossing religion around or preferring one to
another or forcing religiously serious people to violate their
conscience. Somewhere along the way the government pounded this
Constitutional shield into a sword to use to politically marginalize the
religious, especially traditionalist religions like Catholics, Evangelical
Christians, and Mormons.
That’s
a scandal.
“A
wall of separation between Church and State” is a direct quote from a letter
from President Jefferson to a Connecticut Baptist congregation unequivocally
promising them that the government would not go around bullying them.
It
was not meant to inhibit
religion from the sphere of politics. You
can read Jefferson’s letter here. It’s
short and sweet and exalts the rights of conscience. I wrote about it here at the Huffington
Post. If you wish to drill down into the primary sources and scholarship:
Jefferson’s public support for religion appears,
however, to have been more than a cynical political gesture. Scholars have
recently argued that in the 1790s Jefferson developed a more favorable view of
Christianity that led him to endorse the position of his fellow Founders that
religion was necessary for the welfare of a republican government, that it was,
as Washington proclaimed in his Farewell Address, indispensable for the
happiness and prosperity of the people. Jefferson had, in fact, said as much in
his First Inaugural Address. His attendance at church services in the House
was, then, his way of offering symbolic support for religious faith and for its
beneficent role in republican government.
Jefferson
was all about keeping the state “within its well-appointed limits.” He was
never about letting the government go around hippie-punching Christians (or any
other faith) for engaging in politics. To say otherwise is pure revisionist
history.
Jefferson
was by no means alone. President Washington, in his Farewell Address, explicitly exalted religion: Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to
political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain
would that man claim the tribute of patriotism, who should labor to subvert
these great pillars of human happiness, these firmest props of the duties of
men and citizens. The mere politician, equally with the pious man, ought to
respect and to cherish them. A volume could not trace all their connections
with private and public felicity.
Before
the Constitution the signal lamps for Paul Revere’s famous ride were hung in
the steeple of Christ Church in Boston: One
if by land, two if by sea! Churches
were at the political fore of the abolition of slavery. The
Civil Rights movement was largely prosecuted by pastors like the Rev. Martin
Luther King.
The
first federal nondiscrimination order, signed by President John F. Kennedy, prohibited federal
discrimination on the basis of creed (whose
primary dictionary meaning is religious).
With
authentic respect for Social Justice Warriors, Spiritual Justice Warriors
represent an old and noble tradition going all the way back to the Bible. The
Prophets thundered against iniquity, holding the Kings, the politicians of the
day, to account. Whether one condemns inequity or iniquity, “The mere
politician … ought to respect and to cherish” those who take a stand for the
“indispensable supports” of religion and morality.
We
have all pledged allegiance to the republic for which our flag stands, “one
nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.” Spiritual
Justice Warriors and Social Justice Warriors both would do well to applaud
President Trump when he declares that he will “tear down that wall,” the
Johnson Amendment, that inhibits religious institutions from engaging
politically.
Originally
published on Forbes.
No comments:
Post a Comment